期刊文献+

Inflatable rock bolt bond strength versus rock mass rating (RMR): A comparative analysis of pull-out testing data from underground mines in Nevada 被引量:3

Inflatable rock bolt bond strength versus rock mass rating(RMR):A comparative analysis of pull-out testing data from underground mines in Nevada
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The purpose of this paper is to establish confidence in anticipated minimum bond strength for inflatable rock bolts by comparing the bond strength to variable geotechnical conditions using the rock mass rating (RMR) system. To investigate a correlation between these parameters, the minimum bond strength of pull-out tested inflatable rock bolts was compared to the RMR of the rock in which these bolts were placed. Bond strength vs. RMR plots indicate that expected minimum bond strength is positively corre- lated with RMR; however, the correlation is not strong. Cumulative percent graphs indicate that 97~; of pull-out tests result in a minimum bond strength of 3.3 and 1.7 ton/m in RMR/〉 45 and 〈45, respectively. Although lower bond strengths are more commonly encountered in low RMR ground, high bond strengths are possible as well, yielding higher variability in bond strengths in low RMR ground. Bond strength of friction bolts relies on contact between the rock bolt and drill hole. Experience in Nevada indicates that RMR is known to affect both the quality and consistency of drill holes which likely affects bond strength. Drilling and bolting in low RMR ground is more sensitive to drilling and bolting practices, and strategies for maximizing bond strength in these conditions are discussed. The purpose of this paper is to establish confidence in anticipated minimum bond strength for inflatable rock bolts by comparing the bond strength to variable geotechnical conditions using the rock mass rating(RMR) system. To investigate a correlation between these parameters,the minimum bond strength of pull-out tested inflatable rock bolts was compared to the RMR of the rock in which these bolts were placed. Bond strength vs. RMR plots indicate that expected minimum bond strength is positively correlated with RMR; however,the correlation is not strong. Cumulative percent graphs indicate that 97% of pull-out tests result in a minimum bond strength of 3.3 and 1.7 ton/m in RMR P 45 and <45,respectively.Although lower bond strengths are more commonly encountered in low RMR ground,high bond strengths are possible as well,yielding higher variability in bond strengths in low RMR ground. Bond strength of friction bolts relies on contact between the rock bolt and drill hole. Experience in Nevada indicates that RMR is known to affect both the quality and consistency of drill holes which likely affects bond strength. Drilling and bolting in low RMR ground is more sensitive to drilling and bolting practices,and strategies for maximizing bond strength in these conditions are discussed.
出处 《International Journal of Mining Science and Technology》 SCIE EI CSCD 2016年第1期19-22,共4页 矿业科学技术学报(英文版)
关键词 Rock mass ratingRMRRock boltPull-out testBond strength 岩体质量分级 粘结强度 摩擦锚杆 拉拔试验 RMR 内华达州 试验数据 地下矿山
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Sandbak LA, Rai AR. Ground support strategies at the Turquoise ridge joint venture, Nevada. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2012:46:437-54.
  • 2Sun C. Ground control practice and Leeville underground mine. In: Proceedings of 32rid ICGCM: 2013.
  • 3Martin LA, Goris J, Roberts L. Design and testing of a nondestructive friction bolt tester. NIOSH; 2004. p. 131.
  • 4Barton NR, Lien R, Lunde J. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 1974;6:189-239.
  • 5Bieniawski Z'I'. Rock mechanics design in mining and tunneling. Rotterdam; 1984. p. 272.
  • 6Brady TR, Pakalnis LC. Design in weak rock masses: Nevada underground mining operations. SME; 2005.
  • 7Soni A. Analysis of Swellex bolt performance and a standardized rock bolt pull- test data sheet and database. Toronto: University of Toronto, Department of Civil Engineering: 2000.
  • 8Gregory N. A study of correlations between rock bolt pufi-out tests and rock mass rating scores in underground mining. Reno: University of Nevada: 2014.
  • 9Tomory PB, Grabinsky MW, Curran JH, Carvalho J. Factors influencing the effectiveness of split set friction stabilizer bolts. CIMMP 1998;91:205-14.

同被引文献10

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部