期刊文献+

局部均衡条件下我国外包企业技术优势及溢出效应研究——基于技术复杂度视角 被引量:2

Technological Advantage and Spillovers of Outsourcing under Partial Equilibrium: from the View of Technology Complexity
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章构建了局部均衡条件下发展中国家外包企业生产率效应的理论框架,并根据技术复杂度指数对我国制造行业进行划分。在此基础上,采用1993~2011年行业面板数据,对不同技术复杂度行业的外包企业技术优势及溢出效应进行检验,重点考察美国和日本两国外包企业生产率效应的差异。研究结果显示:(1)外包企业拥有技术优势,美国及日本外包企业的优势大于平均水平,其中美国外包企业的技术优势最为明显。此外,美、日外包企业低技术复杂度行业的技术优势大于高技术复杂度行业。(2)外包企业对非外包企业存在显著的溢出效应,日本外包企业的技术溢出效应大于美国外包企业。在高技术复杂度行业,外包企业溢出效应为正,促进了非外包企业产出增长。在低技术复杂度行业,日本外包企业呈现出正效应;美国外包企业溢出效应则为负,对非外包企业的生产起到挤出作用。(3)外包企业的技术优势与其溢出效应显示出一定程度的负相关,并且在高技术复杂度行业表现得尤为明显。 The paper constructs a theoretical framework of productivity effect of outsourcees in a developing economy under partial equilibrium. With sectors divided according to technological complexity,technological advantage and spillovers on non-outsourcees are tested using panel-data of 1993 ~ 2011,with specific origins from the US and Japan. Estimate results show that( 1) Outsourcees possess technological advantage,and outsourcing activities from the US and Japan own greater technological advantage than average level,with those of US outsourcing most remarkable. Moreover,the US and Japanese outsourcee manufacturers have greater technological advantage in the low technology-complexity sectors than those in the high ones.( 2) Outsourcees have significant spillover effects on non-outsourcees and Japanese outsourcees possess greater spillovers than US ones. In the high technology-complexity sectors,there are positive spillovers. However,in the low technology-complexity sectors,Japanese outsourcees have positive spillovers while US ones exert negative spillovers,crowding out the output of non-outsourcees.( 3) There is negative correlation between technological advantage and spillovers,particularly evident in the high technology-complexity sectors.
出处 《世界经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期58-68,136,共11页 World Economy Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Amiti M, Wei S J.. Service Offshoring and Productivity: Evidence from the US [J]. The World Economy, 2009, 32(2) : 203-220.
  • 2Farinas J C. , Lopez A, Martin-Maroos A.. Assessing the Impact of Domestic Outsourcing and Offshoring on Productivity at the Firm Level [J]. Applied Economics, 2014, 46(15) : 1814-1828.
  • 3Feder G.. On Exports and Economic Growth [ J]. Journal of Development Economics. 1982, 12: 59-73.
  • 4Feenstra R C, Hanson G H.. Foreign Investment, Outsourcing and Relative Wage [ D ]. National Bueau of Economic Research, Working Pa- per 5121,1995.
  • 5Feenstm R C, Hanson G H.. Globalization, Outsourcing and Wage Inequality [ D ]. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 5424,1996.
  • 6Findlay R.. Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment, and the Transfer of Technology : A Simple Dynamic Model. Quarterly Jour- nal of Economics. 1978, 92 (1) : 1-16.
  • 7Fredrik, Sjfiholm. Productivity Growth in Indonesia: The Role of Regional Characteristics and Direct Foreign Investment. Working Paper, 1998, 47(3) :559-584.
  • 8Gorg H, Hanley A.. International Outsourcing and Productivity: Evidence from the Irish Electronics Industry [ J ]. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2005,16(2) :255-269.
  • 9Haddad M, Harrison A.. Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? : Evidence from panel data for Morocco[ J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1993, 42 (93) :51-74.
  • 10Huay Huay Lee, Hui Boon Tan. Technology Transfer, FDI and Economic Growth in the ASEAN Region [ J ]. Joumal of the Asia Pacific E- conomy, 2006, 11 (4) :394-410.

二级参考文献104

共引文献226

同被引文献57

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部