期刊文献+

环境协商治理的理论逻辑与制度反思——以《环境保护公众参与办法》为例 被引量:13

Reflection upon the Theoretical Logic and System of Deliberative Environmental Governance: Based on Measues on Public Participation in Environmental Protection
原文传递
导出
摘要 环境协商治理的理论认知来自于对其内在意蕴的把握以及其理论来源的分析。环境治理公众参与具备了实现、保障和实现公民环境权利的功能并且富有从实体到程序上的理论与实践价值。哈贝马斯的协商民主理论从人性角度出发,通过交往理性的逻辑推演出协商民主理论,这种民主模式对于公共事务的治理有着互相推动、共同促进的作用。但环境协商治理面临的现实困境是环境私主体参与制度存在着严重不足,社会保守思潮盛行,为此,应当推进贯彻善治理念优化官民关系,革新环境行政程序,创新社会管理,使环境市民社会得到快速成长。 The theoretical knowledge of deliberative environmental governance comes from the grasp of its inner meaning and the analysis of its theoretical sources. Public participation in environmental governance helps safeguard and realize the environmental rights of the general public, and is valuable in practice and theory from entities to procedures. Starting from human nature, Habermas deduced deliberative democracy theory from the logic of communicative reason. This democracy model and public affairs feed into and push each other. The real predicaments facing deliberative environmental governance are the deficiency of private subject participation system and the prevalence of conservatism. Therefore, we need to carry out good governance to better the relationship between the government and the citizens, reform the administrative order of environment, and innovate social administration so as to promote the development of environmental civil society.
作者 秦鹏 唐道鸿
机构地区 重庆大学法学院
出处 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期107-112,共6页 Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"我国再生资源产业顶层设计与发展实现路径研究"(12&ZD209) 重庆市研究生科研创新资助项目(CYB15007)
关键词 协商治理 协商民主 善治 环境影响评价 deliberative governance deliberative democracy good governance environmental impact assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献41

  • 1项继权.参与式治理:臣民政治的终结——《参与式治理:中国社区建设的实践研究》诞生背景[J].社区,2007(05S):62-62. 被引量:18
  • 2Carole Pateman. Participation and Democratic Theory[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
  • 3Benjamin Barber. Strong Democracy[M]. Berkeley: University of California, 1984.
  • 4Archon Fung, Erik Olin Wright. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance [M]. New York: Verso,2003.
  • 5Jurgen R. Grote, Bernard Gbikpi. Participatory Governance: Political and Societal Implications [M]. Opladen: Leske and Budrich, 2002.
  • 6Heinelt, and et al. Participatory Governance in Multi-Level Context[M]. Opladen: Leske and Budrich, 2002.
  • 7International Institute of Labor Studies Workshop. Participatory Governance: A New Regulatory Framework? [Z]. 9 - 10 December, 2005. IILS, Geneva.
  • 8Beate Kohler-Koch. Does Participatory Governance Hold its Promises? [Z]. CONNEX Final Conference Efficient and Democratic Governance in a Multi-Level Europe, Mannheim, March 6-8, 2008.
  • 9Eran Vigoda. From Responsiveness to Collaboration Governance: Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration [J]. Public Administration Review, Vol. 62, No. 5, Sep.- Oct. 2002.
  • 10Amit Ray. Participatory Governance:Addressing the Problem of Rising Groundwater Level in Cities[J].Journal of Human Ecology, 2005, 18 (2).

共引文献363

同被引文献124

引证文献13

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部