期刊文献+

基于土地要素的农户行为决策模型分析——以陕西省米脂县姜兴庄村为例 被引量:1

Land element-based analysis of farmers' decision-making about land use: A case study in Jiangxingzhuang village of Mizhi county,Shaanxi Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 微观经济主体农户行为决策受多因素影响。土地要素是表征农户投资与收入行为的重要因子。农户满意度行为分析可反映农户有限理性种植决策选择机制。两者结合,可表征土地利用变化驱动因子,优化农地景观格局。论文以陕西省米脂县姜兴庄村为例,通过建立土地要素投资收入实证模型、农户效益模型和满意度Probit模型,利用2009—2012年地块与农户调研数据,分析农户土地利用决策影响因素。结论为:1土地碎化程度(-0.279)和土地质量整体状况(0.272)对农户流动资金投入影响强度高;土地灌溉条件(0.165)和土地质量整体状况(0.154)对农户农业收入影响显著。2模型模拟与实测最优对比结果:7.5%,10.6%,20%,轮种混种比例明显占优,体现了农户的满意度偏好决策方式。Probit模型较好地模拟了农户决策行为态度。其中农业活动收入、耕地面积、政策虚拟显著相关。 Micro-economic subject of household behavior decision-making is influenced by many factors. Land element is an important factor in farmers' investment and income behavior. Farmers' satisfaction behavior anal- ysis can better reflect the household bounded rationality and behavior decision-making mechanism. A case was studied for Jiangxingzhuang Village of Mizhi County in Shaanxi Province. After establishing the Investment in- come empirical model and farmers' satisfaction Probit model, using 2009--2012 household survey data to ex- plain and analyze these differences and the influential factors. The conclusions can be drawn as follows: ①The factors in Land fragmentation degree ( - 0. 279) and Land quality overall situation (0. 272) have a significantly affect in farmers' investment behavior. The factors in Land irrigation (0. 165 )and Land quality overall situation (0. 154) have a significantly affect in farmers' incomes behavior.②There is a significant difference between the rational optimal decision and the farmers' actual decision-making in Jingxingzhuang Village ,which can il-lustrate that households' bounded rationality plays an important role. The results revealed that the coetticient of agricultural income is 0. 65, the agricultural acreageis - 0. 56, Policy virtua land is 0. 328, family farmland area is 0.41. All levels show the significant association, and is in line with the comparison between theoretical predictions and actual research.
出处 《西北大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期134-138,共5页 Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41271103 40901093) 教育部人文社科基金资助项目(10YJC790017) 陕西省教育厅基金资助项目(11JK0744) 陕西省社科基金资助项目(2015D055)
关键词 农户 土地要素 probit行为决策模型 姜兴庄村 rural household land element the probit model of behavioral decision Jingxingzhuang Village
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献52

共引文献62

同被引文献14

  • 1FEOLA G, BINDER C R. Why don't pesticide appli- cators protect themselves? Exploring the use of person- al protective equipment among Colombian smallholders [J]. International Journal of Occupational and Envi- ronmental Health, 2010, 16 (1): 11-23.
  • 2DOSS C R. Designing agricultural technology for Afri- can women farmers: Lessons from 25 years of experi- ence[J]. World Development, 2001, 29(12): 2075- 2092.
  • 3ABHILASH P C, SINGH N. Pesticide use and appli- cation: An Indian scenario [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 165(S1-3): 1-12.
  • 4YASSIN M M, MOURAD T A A, SAFI J M. Knowl- edge, attitude, practice, and toxicity symptoms associ- ated with pesticide use among farm workers in the Gaza Strip [ J]. Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 2002, 59 (6) : 387-393.
  • 5WAICHMAN A V, EVE E, NINA N C D S. Do farm- ers understand the information displayed on pesticide product labels? A key question to reduce pesticides ex- posure and risk of poisoning in the Brazilian Amazon [J]. Crop Prot, 2007, 26(4) : 576-583.
  • 6COLE D C, SHERWOOD S, CRISSMAN C, et al. Pesticides and health in highland Ecuadorian potato production: Assessing impacts and developing respon- ses [J]. Int J Occup Environ Health, 2002, 8(3) : 182-190.
  • 7PALIS F G, FLOR R J, WARBURTON H, et al. Our farmers at risk: behavior and belief system in pesticide safety [J]. J Pub Health, 2006, 28(1):43-48.
  • 8ZHONG T Y, ZHANG X Y, HUANG X J. Simulation of farmer decision on land use conversions using deci- sion tree method in Jiangsu Province, China [ J ]. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 2009, 7 ( 3 ) : 687-698.
  • 9TRIANDIS H C. Values, Attitudes and Interpersonal Behavior. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation [ J ]. Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press, 1980, 27: 195-259.
  • 10郗静,曹明明,陈海.退耕还林政策对农户土地利用行为的影响[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(3):5-9. 被引量:16

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部