期刊文献+

私人如何影响言论自由——一个美国法上的观察 被引量:1

On Private Persons' Influence on the Freedom of Speech——An Observation on US Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对言论自由的危害并不只来源于国家,宪法基本权利对于自由的保障也包括防御来自非国家的侵害。通过对政府授权或默许的"私人审查"、媒介编辑裁量权、媒介所有权集中三种较为典型的私人影响言论自由的方式展开讨论,以美国通讯传播法制的管制历史为背景,分析学界、行政管制机关、法院在面对前述问题时提出了何种主张、做出了何种决定。最后回归理论层面,探讨在面对私人影响言论自由时国家角色的转换与定位,如何实现与言论自由的价值之间的调和。 The enemies to freedom of speech not only come from the State,but from the protection of basic constitutional rights of freedom which include the defense against any infringement taken by other enterprises. This article discusses the impact on freedom of speech caused by private forces and the regulation taken by government to balance or to resist the private forces in the US law. This article respectively analyses three types of private forces: the private censorship authorized by the government,media editor discretion and media ownership. Based on the background of US communicative law, which claims and decisions do scholars,administrative regulatory agency and the courts raise? Finally,this paper returns to the theoretical level to indicate the role of the State in face of the private forces and how to coordinate with the value of freedom of speech.
作者 付婧
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《北京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期37-49,共13页 Social Sciences of Beijing
关键词 言论自由 色情资讯管制 编辑裁量权 网络中立性 媒介所有权集中 freedom of speech regulation on pornography media editor discretion network neutrality media ownership concentration
  • 相关文献

参考文献82

  • 1Barton J A. Access to the Press A New First Amendment Right [ J ]. Harvard Law Review, 1967 (8).
  • 2时飞.网络过滤技术的正当性批判——对美国网络法学界一个理论论争的观察[J].环球法律评论,2011,33(1):106-118. 被引量:14
  • 3Yen A C. Preliminary First Amendment Analysis of Legislation Treating News Aggregation as Copyright Infringement [J]. Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L, 2010, 12 (4).
  • 4刘静怡.言论自由、媒体类型与民主政治[J].月旦法学教室,2005(42).
  • 5United States v. Playboy Entm't Group, Inc. , 529 U.S. 803 (2000).
  • 6Reno v. ACLU, 521 U.S. 844 (1997).
  • 7ACLU v. Reno 31 F. Supp. 2d 473 (E. D. Pa. 1999).
  • 8ACLU v. Reno 217 F. 3d 162 (3rd Cir. , 2000).
  • 9Ashcrofl v. ACLU, 535 U.S. 564 (2002).
  • 10Ashcroft v. ACLU, 542 U. S. 656 (2004).

二级参考文献86

  • 1包万超.行政法平衡理论比较研究[J].中国法学,1999(2):58-74. 被引量:50
  • 2罗豪才,袁曙宏,李文栋.现代行政法的理论基础——论行政机关与相对一方的权利义务平衡[J].中国法学,1993(1):52-59. 被引量:224
  • 3劳伦斯·莱斯格.《代码》,中信出版社,2004年版.
  • 4[德]卡尔·施米特.《论断与概念:在与魏玛、日内瓦、凡尔赛的斗争中(1923-1939)》,朱雁冰译,上海人民出版社2006年版,第125-126页.
  • 5Lawrence Lessig, Zones of Cyberspace, Stanford Law Review, vol. 48, 1996, p. 1411.
  • 6孙斯坦.《设计民主:论宪法的作用》,第2章.
  • 7Harry H. Wellington, On Freedom of Expression, Yale Law Journal, vol. 88,1979, pp. 1106 -1107.
  • 8Jennifer L. Brenner, True Threats: A More Appropriate Standard for Analyzing First Amendment Protection and Free Speech When Violence Is Perpetrated Over the Intemet, North Dakota Law Review, vol. 78,2002, p. 762.
  • 9Prana A. Topper, The Threatening Interact: Planned Parenthood v. ACLA & A Context-Based Approach to Interact Threats, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, vol. 33, 2001, p. 228.
  • 10J. M. Balkin, Media Filters, the V - Chip, and the Foundations of Broadcast Regulation, Duke Law Journal, vol. 45, 1996, p. 1143.

共引文献100

同被引文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部