期刊文献+

两种微创术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床比较 被引量:7

Clinical comparison between two kinds of minimally invasive surgry in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对比研究腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查术(LTCBDE)与内镜逆行性胰胆管造影/内镜下括约肌切开取石术(ERCP/EST)在胆道外科中的应用。方法:回顾性分析2010-03-2015-08我院收治的胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的患者54例,依据手术方式的不同,将其分为LTCBDE+腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)组(n=21)和ERCP/EST+LC组(n=33),对比分析2组患者手术成功率、术后并发症、平均手术时间及平均住院时间等临床指标。结果:LTCBDE+LC组住院时间明显短于ERCP/EST+LC组[(9.74±4.50)d vs.(17.54±5.10)d,P<0.01)];LTCBDE+LC组术后医源性胰腺炎、术后残石并发症发生率明显低于ERCP/EST+LC组(0vs.12.12%,0vs.15.15%,P<0.01)。此外,由于ERCP/EST+LC组常规术后留置鼻胆引流管,患者主观不适感受明显加重,其术后患者疼痛评分明显高于LTCBDE+LC组[(7.10±2.70)分vs.(4.50±3.10)分,P<0.01)]。结论:相比ERCP/EST,LTCBDE是更有利于胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的微创治疗手段。 Objective:Comparision study on the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis between laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration(LTCBDE)and endoscopic retrogrede cholangiopancreatography/endoscopic sphinctercotomy(ERCP/EST)in the application of the biliary tract surgery.Method:A retrospective analysis of 54 cases of patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis from Mar 2010 to Aug 2015 in our hospital.According to the different approach of surgry,the patients were divided into LTCBDE+laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)group(n=21)and ERCP/EST+LC group(n=33).The success rate of surgery,postoperative complications,the average operation time and average length of hospital stay and other clinical indicators of two groups were analyzed.Result:LTCBDE+LC group has an obviously shorter length of hospital stay than ERCP and EST+LC group[(9.74±4.50)vs.(17.54±5.10)d,P〈0.01)];The iatrogenic postoperative pancreatitis,postoperative residual stone incidence of complications in LTCBDE+LC group was lower than that in group of ERCP and EST+LC(0vs.12.12%;0vs.15.15%,P〈0.01).In addition,as a result of a routine indwelling ENBD tube in postoperative in ERCP/EST+LC group,the patients' subjective unwell feeling is aggravating.And the postoperative pain score was significantly higher than that in LTCBDE+LC group(7.10±2.70)vs(4.50±3.10),P〈0.01).Conclusion:Compared with ERCP/EST,LTCBDE is a more conducive treatment for cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis.
出处 《临床急诊杂志》 CAS 2016年第1期41-44,共4页 Journal of Clinical Emergency
关键词 胆总管结石 胆囊结石 腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管取石术 内镜逆行性胰胆管造影 括约肌切开取石术 choledocholithiasis cholecystolithiasis laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration endoscopic retrogrede cholangiopancreatography endoscopic sphinctercotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献62

  • 1聂云贵,丁佑铭,汪斌,张爱民,陈晓燕,王卫星,严际慎.腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查术在老年患者中的应用[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(10):3063-3065. 被引量:4
  • 2李晓阳,王盛江,刘立人,禹宏,慕海峰,郑宇,杨闯,郭薇.腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管取石术的临床应用[J].黑龙江医学,2000(4):14-15. 被引量:9
  • 3陈剑,韦军民.术中微切开胆道镜检查的可行性研究[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2005,11(6):372-374. 被引量:35
  • 4张雷达,王曙光,别平,陈平,董家鸿.不同方式的腹腔镜胆道探查术治疗胆总管结石的临床前瞻性研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2006,12(5):474-477. 被引量:54
  • 5Tranter SE,Thompson MH. Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg, 2002, 89 : 1495-1504.
  • 6Ebner S, Rechner J, Belier S, et al. Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc, 2004, 18:762-765.
  • 7Heili MJ, Wintz NK, Fowler DL. Choledocholithiasis: endoscopic versus laparoscopic management. Am Surg, 1999, 65 : 135-138.
  • 8Rieiardi R, Islam S, Canete JJ, et al. Effectiveness and long term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc ,2003,17 : 19-22.
  • 9Saito M, Tsuyuguchi T, Yamaguchi T, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis with cholecystolithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc, 2000,51:540-545.
  • 10Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc ,2003,57 : 151-155.

共引文献72

同被引文献64

引证文献7

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部