期刊文献+

Comparison Between North-South Aid and South-South Cooperation:Based on the Analysis of the New Development Finance Institutions

Comparison Between North-South Aid and South-South Cooperation:Based on the Analysis of the New Development Finance Institutions
原文传递
导出
摘要 According to the different players, development cooperation is often divided into North-South Aid and South-South Cooperation, both of which have a history of several decades. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the rise of a number of emerging economies has brought South-South Cooperation into a new stage, which can be seen from the establishment of some new development finance institutions led by developing countries. BRICS Bank, Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank(AIIB) and Silk Road Fund are three important new development finance institutions. Compared with the traditional development finance institutions like World Bank and International Monetary Fund(IMF), they have their own concepts of development cooperation, which are different from the traditional ones. First, the new finance institutions pay more attention to the equality between partners, not imposing conditions and respecting the ownership of development partners. Second, the new development finance institutions value the market philosophy, which means that they emphasize the importance of field investigation and implement development cooperation in accordance with the actual needs of the partners and the comparative advantages of the providers. Finally, the new development finance institutions focus their resources on problem-solving and avoid doctrines-imposing. They believe that it is easier for the developing countries to achieve development through a gradual and bottom-up model. Although there are differences between the traditional and new development finance institutions, the latter is not parallel to or substitute of the former.They can cooperate with each other and provide better public goods for international cooperation through inclusive competition. According to the different players, development cooperation is often divided into North-South Aid and South-South Cooperation, both of which have a history of several decades. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the rise of a number of emerging economies has brought South-South Cooperation into a new stage, which can be seen from the establishment of some new development finance institutions led by developing countries. BRICS Bank, Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and Silk Road Fund are three important new development finance institutions. Compared with the traditional development finance institutions like World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), they have their own concepts of development cooperation, which are different from the traditional ones. First, the new finance institutions pay more attention to the equality between partners, not imposing conditions and respecting the ownership of development partners. Second, the new development finance institutions value the market philosophy, which means that they emphasize the importance of field investigation and implement development cooperation in accordance with the actual needs of the partners and the comparative advantages of the providers. Finally, the new development finance institutions focus their resources on problem-solving and avoid doctrines-imposing. They believe that it is easier for the developing countries to achieve development through a gradual and bottom-up model. Although there are differences between the traditional and new development finance institutions, the latter is not parallel to or substitute of the former. They can cooperate with each other and provide better public goods for international cooperation through inclusive competition.
作者 崔文星
出处 《Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong university(Science)》 EI 2016年第1期25-32,共8页 上海交通大学学报(英文版)
关键词 development cooperation South-South Cooperation BRICS Bank Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank(AIIB) development cooperation, South-South Cooperation, BRICS Bank, Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1UK Government. Colonial development act 1929 [EB/OL]. [2015-08-23]. http://www.legislation.gov. uk/ukpga/Geo5/20-21/5/enacted.
  • 2UK Government. The colonial development and welfare act 1940 [EB/OL]. [2015-08-23]. http://www. odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications- opinion-files/ 8077.pdf.
  • 3ZHU J J. Strategic positioning and mechanism design of the BRICS Bank [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2015:106 (in Chinese).
  • 4Agreement on the new development bank [EB/OL]. [2015-08-23]. http://ndbbrics.org/agreement.html.
  • 5Asian infrastructure investment bank--Articles of agreement [EB/OL]. [2015-08-23]. http://www.aiib. org/uploadfile/2015/0814/20150814022158430.pdf.
  • 6WANG T Y. International law [M]. Beijing: Law Press China, 1995:84-85 (in Chinese).
  • 7ZHANG H B. Development-oriented aid--Pattern of China's aid to Africa [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2013:130 (in Chinese).
  • 8CUMMING G. Aid to Africa: French and British poli- cies from the Cold War to the New Millennium [M]. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001: 104-113.
  • 9ZHANG Y P. International Development Coopera- tion and Africa--A comparative study on Chinese and western aid to Africa [M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Aca- demic Press, 2012:44 (in Chinese).
  • 10BROWNE S. Aid and influence: Does donors help or hinder? [M]. New York: Routledge, 2006: 45.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部