期刊文献+

学生生涯建构问卷的修订 被引量:6

Revision of Student Career Construction Inventory
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:修订学生生涯建构问卷(Student Career Construction Inventory,SCCI),考察其在中国高中生群体中的信度和效度。方法:在北京四所中学收集有效数据1466份,并在两周后对其中的76人进行重测。结果:SCCI经过修订后包含22个条目4个维度,各条目与总分的相关在0.41到0.72之间,探索性和验证性因素分析均支持4维度的理论模型。四维度得分及总分与效标之间的相关均显著。总量表内部一致性信度和重测信度分别为0.92和0.90,四维度的内部一致性信度在0.76到0.82之间,重测信度在0.64到0.76之间。人口学变量差异检验显示女生在职业探索和生涯决策两维度的得分显著高于男生,高二年级的学生在职业探索维度上得分高于高一年级。结论:修订后的学生生涯建构问卷在中国高中生群体中具有良好的信效度,可以用于中国高中学生群体的研究。 Objective: To revise Student Career Construction Inventory(SCCI) in Chinese high school students. Meth- ods: The study was conducted in 1466 high school students. Item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, cri- terion correlation and reliability analysis were used to test the reliability and validity of Student Career Construction Invento- ry. Results: Chinese form of SCCI had 22 items and 4 dimensions. Correlations of item scores with total score ranged from 0.41 to 0.72. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized 4-factor model of SC- CI. Scores of 4 dimensions and total score were significantly related to the criterion variables(ranging from 0.27 to 0.57). Re- liability coefficients of the four dimensions ranged from 0.76 to 0.82(0.92 for the total), and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.64 to 0.76(0.90 for the total). Difference analysis in demographic variables indicated that the female scored higher than the male in occupational exploration and career decision-making; the second grade senior students scored higher than the first grade senior students in occupational exploration. Conclusion: The revised Chinese version of SCCI has sufficient reliability and validity in high school students.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期100-103,128,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAI36B00)
关键词 生涯建构 生涯发展 生涯测验 高中生 Career construction Career development Career assessment High school students
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Savickas ML. Career construction theory and practice. In Brown SD, Lent RW. Career development and counseling:Putting theory and research to work(2nd edition). Hoboken, New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2013. 147-183.
  • 2侯悍超,侯志瑾,杨菲菲.叙事生涯咨询——生涯咨询的新模式[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(3):555-559. 被引量:7
  • 3Savickas ML. Career construction:A developmental theory of vocational behavior. In Brown D. Career Choice and Development(4th edition). San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass, Inc, 2002. 149-205.
  • 4Savickas ML, Porfeli EJ. Student Career Construction Inventory. from http://www.vocopher.com/ms/scci/SCCI_Master. pdf. 2011.
  • 5Rocha M, Guimar?es MI. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the student career construction inventory for a portguguese sample:Formative and reflective constructs. Psychological Reports, 2012, 111(3):845-869.
  • 6Savickas ML. Career adaptability:An integrative construct for life-span, life-space theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 1997, 45:247-259.
  • 7Hou ZJ, Leung, SA, Li X, et al. Career adapt-abilities scale-china form:Construction and initial validation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2012, 80(3):686-691.
  • 8Porfeli EJ, Savickas, ML. Career adapt-abilities scale-USA form:Psychometric properties and relation to vocational identity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2012, 80(3):748-753.
  • 9Savickas ML, Porfeli EJ. Revision of the career maturity inventory:The adaptability form. Journal of Career Assessment, 2011, 19(4):355-374.
  • 10曲可佳,邹泓.职业生涯探索的结构、方法及影响因素[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(2):442-450. 被引量:36

二级参考文献138

共引文献2812

同被引文献54

引证文献6

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部