期刊文献+

正常成人髋关节软骨厚度的MRI测量研究 被引量:4

To Measure the Articular Cartilage Tickness of the Normal Adult Hip Joint Using MRI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对正常成人髋关节不同部位软骨厚度的MR测量值分析,明确正常成人髋关节软骨的分布特征。方法选择健康成年志愿者30例(共60髋),年龄范围23-54岁,平均年龄37.7岁,应用3.0T磁共振3D-FS-SPGR序列进行双髋关节轴位扫描。利用MPR得到股骨头正中冠状面图像,选取4个测量点即冠状位-45°、冠状位45°、冠状位90°和冠状位135°进行软骨厚度测量,对不同位置所测关节软骨厚度进行比较,并对髋关节软骨厚度与受检者年龄、身高、体重进行相关分析。结果髋关节软骨厚度分布不均匀,冠状位-45°、冠状位45°、冠状位90°和冠状位135°髋关节软骨厚度分别为1.380±0.077mm、1.645±0.094mm、1.640±0.094mm、1.350±0.089mm;四个测量点之间软骨厚度差异有统计学意义(F=65.473,P=0.000)。冠状位-45°与45°、冠状位-45°与90°、冠状位135°与45°、冠状位135°与90°两两之间软骨厚度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);余两两之间软骨厚度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。髋关节软骨厚度与年龄、身高、体重无相关性,r=-0.005、-0.321、-0.255(P>0.05)。结论正常成人髋关节负重区和非负重区软骨厚度不同,负重区髋关节软骨较非负重区厚。健康成人髋关节软骨厚度与年龄、身高、体重无相关关系。 Objective To clarify the distribution characteristics of normal adult hip cartilage through analyzing the cartilage-thickness. Methods Methods 30 healthy adult volunteers, age from 23 to 54 years(mean 37.7 years), were scanned at 3.0T MR with 3D-FSSPGR sequence. Four points, including coronal-45°、coronal 45°、coronal 90°、coronal 135°, which were got from the middle coronal images of the femoral head by MPR, were selected to measure the thickness of cartilage. Results The cartilagethickness of the hip were inhomogeneously, being respectively 1.380±0.077mm、1.645±0.094mm、1.640±0.094 mm and 1.350±0.089 mm for coronal-45°、45°、90° and 135°. There was a significantly difference among 4 points(F=65.473, P=0.000): between coronal-45°and 45°、coronal-45°and 90°、coronal135°and 45°, also coronal135°and 90°(P〈0.01). There was no correlation between age or height or weight and the cartilage-thickness, the correlation coefficient being respectively r=-0.005、-0.321、-0.255(P〈0.05). Conclusion The cartilage-thickness of the normal hips were different between weight-bearing area and non-weight-bearing area. The cartilage of weight-bearing area was thicker. There was no correlation between age or height or weight and the thickness of the normal adult hip cartilage.
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2016年第3期111-112,133,共3页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
关键词 关节软骨 测量方法 髋关节 核磁共振成像 Articular Cartilage Measurement Hip Joint Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Yoon HJ, Yoon YC, Choe BK. T2values of femoral cartilageof the knee joint: comparisonbetween pre-contrast and post-contrast images [J]. Korean JRadiol, 2014. Jan-Feb(l): 123-9.
  • 2龙斌,董进,宋少辉,马志娟,涂茜,彭红芬,蒋宇宏.3.0T MRI T2-mapping成像对膝关节软骨退变的临床价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2015,13(1):90-91. 被引量:24
  • 3庞国栋,邵广瑞.磁共振二维常规序列成像对膝关节软骨缺损的诊断价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2014,12(6):84-87. 被引量:15
  • 4Zilkens C,Miese F, Bittersoh B, etal.Direct comparison of intra-art i c u 1 a r versus intravenousdelayed gadolinium-enhanced MRIof hip joint cart iiage [J]. JMRI,2014. Jan; 39 (1): 94-102.
  • 5McGibbonC, BencardIno J, Yeh E,et a 1.Accuracy of cartilageand subchondral bone spatialthickness distributionfrom MRI [J] . JMRI, 2 0 0 3.Jun; 17 (6): 703-715.
  • 6许建荣,杨世埙,王皖,朱珠华,蒋智铭,蒋尧,翟伟韬,靳激杨.关节软骨MR影像表现特点和各种影响因素[J].中华放射学杂志,1999,33(2):106-109. 被引量:26
  • 7曹宇,赵杰.MR图像中髋关节软骨厚度的测量及校正[J].天津大学学报,2010,43(2):161-167. 被引量:3
  • 8Uh 1 M, Ihl ing C, A1 Imann KH,etal.Human articular cartilage:in vitro correlation of MRI andhistologic findings [J], Europeanradiology, 1998. 8: 1123-1 129.
  • 9Mas i JN,Se11 C A, Phan C,eta 1. Cart i1 age MR imaging at1.5T: preliminary resultsin a porcine model [ J].Radiology, 2005. 236: 140-150.
  • 10Peh WCG,Chan JHM.Artifactsin musculoskeletalmagnetic resonanceimaging: identificationand correction[J]. Skeletalradiology, 2001. 30: 179-191.

二级参考文献31

  • 1张敏,李石玲,郭智萍,张伟,马晓晖,蔡朋利,魏培建,彭志刚,孙英彩,张泽坤.膝关节软骨损伤的MR诊断及与关节镜结果对照[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(7):731-735. 被引量:35
  • 2Hall F M,Wyshak G. Thickness of articular cartilage in the normal knee [J]. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,1980,62(A):408-413.
  • 3Leersum M D V,Schweitzer M E,Gannon F,et al. Thickness of patella-femoral articular cartilage as measured on MR imaging-Sequence comparison of accuracy,reproducibility,and inter-observer variation [J]. Skeletal Radiology, 1995,24-431-435.
  • 4Akhtar S,Poh C L,Kitney R I. An MRI derived articular cartilage visualization framework [J]. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage,2007,15 (9) :1070-1085.
  • 5Sabine W,Thomas M,Wilhelme H,et al. Quantitative assessment of patellar cartilage volume and thickness at 3.0 T comparing a 3D-fast low angle shot versus a 3D- ture fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence for reproducibility [J]. Investigative Radiology,2006, 41:189-197.
  • 6Duryea J ,Neumann G,Brem M H,et al. Novel fast semiautomated software to segment cartilage for knee MR acquisitions [J]. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage,2007,15 (5) : 487-492.
  • 7Rengle A,Armenean M,Bolbos R,et al. A dedicated two- element phased array receiver coil for high resolusion MRI of rat knee cartilage at 7 T [C]//Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. Lyon,France,2007 : 3886-3889.
  • 8McGibbon C A,Bencardino J,Yeh E D,et al. Accuracy of cartilage and subcbondral bone spatial thickness distribution from MRI [J]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2003,17 (6) :703-715.
  • 9Neumann G,Mendicuti A D,Zou K H,et al. Prevalence of labral tears and cartilage loss in patients with mechanical symptoms of the hip:Evaluation using MR arthrography [J]. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage,2007,15 (8) :909- 917.
  • 10Takao M,Sugano N,Nishii T,et al. Application of three- dimensional magnetic resonance image registration for monitoring hip joint disease [J]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2005,23 : 665-670.

共引文献88

同被引文献49

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部