期刊文献+

强化抗血小板治疗对急性心肌梗死合并糖尿病患者的疗效 被引量:16

Therapeutic effect of intensive anti-platelet therapy on patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated diabetes mellitus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者应用三重强化抗血小板治疗的疗效与安全性。方法:选择100例AMI合并T2DM患者均分为常规治疗组(在常规治疗的基础上接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗)和替罗非班组(在常规治疗组基础上加用替罗非班)。检测比较两组患者的血小板计数(PLT)、血小板活化因子(PAF)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶事件(APTT)、纤维蛋白酶(Fg)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室短轴缩短分数(LVFS)、每搏输出量(SV)以及临床疗效的差异。随访半年,比较两组患者主要不良心脏事件(MACE)及各种出血事件发生率。结果:与常规治疗组相比,替罗非班组的PLT[(18.2±2.5)×109/L比(15.8±1.4)×109/L]及PAF[(138.6±10.2)μg/L比(61.5±3.1)μg/L]显著降低(P<0.05,<0.01);LVEF[(56.9±5.2)%比(64.2±4.6)%]、LVFS[(30.4±3.3)%比(39.8±4.5)%]以及SV[(43.2±3.4)ml比(74.5±4.6)ml]、总有效率(76.0%比96.0%)显著升高(P均<0.05)。随访半年,两组的MACE发生率以及出血率均无显著差异(P均>0.05)。结论:AMI合并T2DM患者接受三重强化抗血小板的治疗疗效显著,而不良反应及预后与常规的双重抗血小板治疗无显著差异。 Objective: To analyze therapeutic effect and safety of triple intensive anti- platelet therapy on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated type 2 diabetes meUitus (T2DM). Methods.. A total of 100 AMI + T2DM patients were enrolled and equally divided into routine treatment group (received aspirin and clopi- dogrel treatment based on routine treatment) and tirofiban group (received tirofiban based on routine treatment group). Platelet count (PLT), platelet activating factor (PAF), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thrombo- plastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (Fg), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular fractional short- ening (LVFS), stroke volume (SV) and therapeutic effect were measured and compared between two groups. All patients were followed up for six months, incidence rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and vari-ous hemorrhage events were compared between two groups. Results: Compared with routine treatment group, there were significant reductions in PLT [ (18.2±2.5) 109/L vs. (15.8± 1.4) 109/L] and PAF [ (138.6 ± 10.2) μg/L vs. (61.5 ± 3.1) μg/L] (P〈0.05, 〈0.01); and significant rise in LVEF [ (56.9 ± 5.2)% vs. (64. 2 ± 4. 6)% ], LVFS [ (30.4±3.3)% vs. (39.8±4.5)%] , SV[ (43.2±3.4) mlvs. (74.5±4.6) ml] and total effective rate (76. 0% vs. 96. 0%) in tirofiban group, P〈0.05 all. After six- month follow- up, there were no significant difference in incidence rates of MACE and bleeding between two groups, P〉0.05 all. Conclusion: Therapeutic effect of triple in- tensive anti- platelet therapy is significant in AMI + T2DM patients, and its adverse reactions and prognosis have no difference with those of dual anti- platelet therapy.
出处 《心血管康复医学杂志》 CAS 2016年第1期84-87,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 心肌梗死 糖尿病 2型 血小板聚集抑制剂 治疗结果 Myocardial infarction , Diabetes mellitus, type 2 Platelet aggregation inhibitors Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Puri A,Bansal A,Narain VS,et al.Comparative assessment of platelet GpIIb/IIIa receptor occupancy ratio with Eptifibatide/ Tirofiban in patients presenting with ACS and undergoing PCI [J].Indian Heart J,2013,65(2):152-157.
  • 2Blancas Gomez-Casero R,Quintana Diaz M,Chana Garcia M,et al.Influence of the combination of antiplatelet agents on the occurrence of early left ventricular insufficiency in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation[J],Med Clin(Bare),2014,142(7):293-298.
  • 3Argay M,Koos I,Takecs I,et al.Pharmaceutical care for pa- tients with acute myocardial infarction in Hungary[J].Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther,2013,51(2):91-95.
  • 4程冬生,程家亮,程应樟.替罗非班、氯吡格雷和曲美他嗪联合用于急性冠脉综合征疗效观察和安全性评价[J].实用临床医学(江西),2009,10(12):19-22. 被引量:5
  • 5Zhang Y,Gao C,Liu H,et al.Routine early versus deferred provisional tirofiban treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol,2013;40(4):289-294.
  • 6Reaume KT,Regal RE,Dorsch MP.Indications for dual anti- platelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel:evidence-based recommendations for use[J].Ann Pharmacother,2008,42(4):550-557.
  • 7Rubboli A,Oldgren J,Marin F,et al.Combination of a new o- ral anticoagulant,aspirin and clopidogrel after acute coronary syndrome:new therapeutic standard[J].Intern Emerg Med,2013,8(8):673-680.
  • 8Lhermusier T,Voisin S,Murat G,et al.Switching patients from clopidogrel to novel P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome:comparative effects of prasugrel and ti- cagrelor on platelet reactivity[J].Int J Cardiol ,2014,174(3):874-876.
  • 9Maruyama H,Fukuoka T,Deguchi I,et al.Dual antiplatelet therapy clopidogrel with low-dose cilostazol intensifies platelet inhibition in patients with ischemic stroke[J].Intern Med,2013,52(10):1043-1047.
  • 10李牧蔚,赵香梅,饶立新,陈岩,朱中玉,高传玉.磺达肝癸钠联合替罗非班在复杂冠状动脉介入治疗的应用[J].中华内科杂志,2013,52(12):1037-1040. 被引量:10

二级参考文献30

  • 1滕尧文.曲美他嗪治疗不稳定型心绞痛的疗效评价[J].中国心血管病研究,2005,3(3):212-213. 被引量:31
  • 2杨晓燕,龚培力,王琳,李芳,王朝晖,王秋芬,陈健,党瑜华,赵洛沙,许爱国,刘鹏.替罗非班治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的疗效和安全性评价[J].中国医院药学杂志,2006,26(3):275-278. 被引量:29
  • 3Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction : a report of the AmericanCollege of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force onPractice Guidelines ( Writing Committee to Revise the 2002Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction ) developed incollaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians,the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions,andthe Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the AmericanAssociation of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation andthe Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50: el-el 57.
  • 4Society of Cardiology,Bassand JP,Hamm CW,et al. Guidelinesfor the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acutecoronary syndromes. Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment ofNon-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes ofEuropean. Eur Heart J, 2007 ,28 : 1598-1660.
  • 5Subherwal S,Bach RG, Chen AY, et al. Baseline risk of majorbleeding in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction : theCRUSADE ( Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable anginapatients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation ofthe ACC/AHA Guidelines ) Bleeding Score. Circulation, 2009 ,119:1873-1882.
  • 6Cohen M, Theroux P, Borzak S, et al. Randomized double-blindsafety study of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patientswith non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treatedwith tirofiban and aspirin ; the ACUTE II study. TheAntithrombotic Combination Using Tirofiban and Enoxaparin. AmHeart J,2002,144:470477.
  • 7Chan AW,Molitemo DJ, Berger PB,et al. Triple antiplatelettherapy during percutaneous coronary intervention is associatedwith improved outcomes including one-year survival : results fromthe Do Tirofiban and ReoProGive Similar Efficacy Outcome Trial(TARGET). J Am Coll Cardiol,2003 ,42 : 1188-1195.
  • 8A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin forunstable angina. Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic SyndromeManagement (PRISM) Study Investigators. N Engl J Med, 1998,338:1498-1505.
  • 9Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa receptor withtirofiban in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management inPatients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS)Study Investigators. N Engl J Med, 1998 ,338 : 1488-1497.
  • 10Effects of platelet glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban onadverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acutemyocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. TheRESTORE Investigators. Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofibanfor Outcomes and REstenosis. Circulation, 1997 ,96 : 1445-1453.

共引文献25

同被引文献145

引证文献16

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部