期刊文献+

临床实验室分析质量目标的共识(上) 被引量:11

Consensus on the analysis quality goal of clinical laboratories(Ⅰ)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 临床实验室的检验质量关系到患者的生命安全,因此建立评价检测结果质量(即分析质量)的方法及指标成为检测结果使用者研究、评论和实践的重点。为了在全球范围内统一分析质量指标的认识、定义以及实际检验质量评估的方法,全世界已召开多次国际协同会议。1999年4月,斯德哥尔摩会议发表的协同声明是临床实验室建立和评估分析质量指标分级的指导原则。2014年5月,在意大利米兰召开的国际会议发表的协同声明对1999年斯德哥尔摩会议确定的分析质量指标的分类做了修改,为今后进一步实施与探讨分析质量指标奠定了基础。 The determination quality of clinical laboratory tests is related to the life safety of patients, and the establishment of evaluation methods and indicators for determination result quality ( analysis quality ) becomes the focus of study, comment and practice. In order to unify the understanding and definition of analysis quality indicators and the practical evaluation methods of determination quality around the world, there were several international consensus meetings. The consensus statement on the Stockholm consensus conference, April 1999, was the guideline for the establishment and evaluation of quality indicator grading for clinical laboratories. At the Milan conference, Italy, May 2014, the consensus statement modified the classification of analysis quality indicators published at the Stockholm consensus conference, 1999, and became the base of further implement and investigation.
作者 冯仁丰
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 2016年第1期1-8,共8页 Laboratory Medicine
关键词 分析性能 性能指标 质量目标 允许误差 协同声明 不精密度 偏移 允许变异系数 允许偏移 Analytical performance Performance indicator Quality goal Allowable error Consensusstatement Imprecision Bias Allowable coefficient of variation Allowable bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1PANTEGHINI M, SANDBERG S. Defining analytical performance specifications 15 years after the Stockholm conference[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 53 (6) : 829-832.
  • 2WESTGARD JO, CAREY RN, WOLD S. Criteria for judging precision and accuracy in method development and evaluation[J]. Clin Chem, 1974, 20 (7) : 825-833.
  • 3WESTGARD JO, HUNT MR. Use and interpretation of common statistical tests in method-comparison studies[J]. ClinChem, 1973, 19 ( 1 ) : 49-57.
  • 4WESTGARD JO, DE VOS DJ, HUNT MR, et al. Concepts and practices in the evaluation of clinical chemistry methods. I. Background and approach[J]. AmJMedTechnol, 1978, 44 (4) : 290-300.
  • 5WESTGARD JO, DE VOS D J, HUNT MR, et al. Concepts and practices in the evaluation of clinical chemistry methods. 11. Experimental procedures[J]. Am J Med Technol, 1978, 44 ( 5 ) : 420-430.
  • 6WESTGARD JO, DE VOS D J, HUNT MR, et al. Concepts and practices in the evaluation of clinical chemistry methods. 11I : Statistics [J]. Am J Med Technol, 1978, 44 (6) : 552-571.
  • 7WESTGARD JO, DE VOS D J, HUNT MR, et al. Concepts and practices in the evaluation of clinical chemistry methods: 1V. Decisions of acceptability[J]. Am J MedTechnol, 1978, 44 (7) : 727-742.
  • 8BARNETT RN. Medical significance of laboratory results[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 1968, 50 (6) : 671- 676.
  • 9CAMPBELL DG, OWEN JA. Clinical laboratory error in perspective[J]. Clin Biochem, 1967, 1 (1) : 3.
  • 10TONKS DB. A study of the accuracy and precision of clinical chemistry determinations in 170 Canadian laboratories[J]. ClinChem, 1963, 9: 217-233.

同被引文献69

引证文献11

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部