期刊文献+

Advantages and limits of hemorrhoidal dearterialization in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids 被引量:2

Advantages and limits of hemorrhoidal dearterialization in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In the last two decades, hemorrhoidal dearterialization has become universally accepted as a treatment option for symptomatic hemorrhoids. The rationale for this procedure is based on the assumption that arterial blood overflow is mainly responsible for dilatation of the hemorrhoidal plexus due to the absence of capillary interposition between the arterial and venous systems within the anal canal. Dearterialization, with either suture ligation(Doppler-guided hemorrhoid artery ligation/transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization) or laser(hemorrhoidal laser procedure), may be successfully performed alone or with mucopexy. Although the added value of Doppler-guidance in association with dearterialization has recently been challenged, this imaging method still plays an important role in localizing hemorrhoidal arteries and, therefore, minimizing the effect of anatomic variation among patients. However, it is important to employ the correct Doppler transducer. Some Doppler transducers may not easily detect superficial arteries due to inadequate frequency settings. All techniques of dearterialization have the advantage of preserving the anatomy and physiology of the anal canal, when compared to other surgical treatments for hemorrhoids. This advantage cannot be underestimated as impaired anal function, including fecal incontinence and other defecation disorders, may occur following surgical treatment for hemorrhoids. Furthermore, this potentially devastating problem can occur in patients of all ages, including younger patients. In the last two decades, hemorrhoidal dearterialization has become universally accepted as a treatment option for symptomatic hemorrhoids. The rationale for this procedure is based on the assumption that arterial blood overflow is mainly responsible for dilatation of the hemorrhoidal plexus due to the absence of capillary interposition between the arterial and venous systems within the anal canal. Dearterialization, with either suture ligation(Doppler-guided hemorrhoid artery ligation/transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization) or laser(hemorrhoidal laser procedure), may be successfully performed alone or with mucopexy. Although the added value of Doppler-guidance in association with dearterialization has recently been challenged, this imaging method still plays an important role in localizing hemorrhoidal arteries and, therefore, minimizing the effect of anatomic variation among patients. However, it is important to employ the correct Doppler transducer. Some Doppler transducers may not easily detect superficial arteries due to inadequate frequency settings. All techniques of dearterialization have the advantage of preserving the anatomy and physiology of the anal canal, when compared to other surgical treatments for hemorrhoids. This advantage cannot be underestimated as impaired anal function, including fecal incontinence and other defecation disorders, may occur following surgical treatment for hemorrhoids. Furthermore, this potentially devastating problem can occur in patients of all ages, including younger patients.
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery》 SCIE CAS 2016年第1期1-4,共4页 世界胃肠外科杂志(英文版)(电子版)
关键词 Dearterialization LASER dearterialization HEMORRHOIDS Mucopexy Dearterialization Laser dearterialization Hemorrhoids Mucopexy
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Goligher JC. Haemorrhoids or piles. In: Surgery of the AnusRectum and Colon, 4th edition (ed Golgher JC). London: BailliereTindall, 1980: 96.
  • 2Gerjy R, Lindhoff-Larson A, Nystr PO. Grade of prolapseand symptoms of haemorrhoids are poorly correlated: result of aclassification algorithm in 270 patients. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10:694-700 [PMID: 18294262 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01498].
  • 3Aigner F, Bodner G, Conrad F, Mbaka G, Kreczy A, FritschH. The superior rectal artery and its branching pattern withregard to its clinical influence on ligation techniques for internalhemorrhoids. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 102-108 [PMID: 14706597DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2002.11.003].
  • 4Schuurman JP, Go PM, Bleys RL. Anatomical branches of thesuperior rectal artery in the distal rectum. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11:967-971 [PMID: 19175645 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01729].
  • 5Aigner F, Bodner G, Gruber H, Conrad F, Fritsch H, Margreiter R,Bonatti H. The vascular nature of hemorrhoids. J Gastrointest Surg2006; 10: 1044-1050 [PMID: 16843876].
  • 6Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G.Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review.Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1665-1671 [PMID: 19690499 DOI:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181af50f4].
  • 7Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Lord AC, Darzi A, Ziprin P. Clinicaloutcome following Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation:a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: e284-e294 [PMID:23489678 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12205].
  • 8Ratto C, Parello A, Veronese E, Cudazzo E, D'gostino E, PaganoC, Cavazzoni E, Brugnano L, Litta F. Doppler-guided transanalhaemorrhoidal dearterialization for haemorrhoids: results froma multicentre trial. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17: O10-O19 [PMID:25213152 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12779].
  • 9Ratto C, Parello A, Donisi L, Litta F, Doglietto GB. Anorectalphysiology is not changed following transanal haemorrhoidaldearterialization for haemorrhoidal disease: clinical, manometric and endosonographic features. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: e243-e245[PMID: 21689336 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02665.x].
  • 10Muoz Yagüe T, Solís-Mu-oz P, Ciriza de los Ríos C, Mu-oz-Garrido F, Vara J, Solís-Herruzo JA. Fecal incontinence in men:causes and clinical and manometric features. World J Gastroenterol2014; 20: 7933-7940 [PMID: 24976729 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7933].

同被引文献4

引证文献2

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部