期刊文献+

纠缠于权力与权利之间——公开审判的中国实践 被引量:3

Entanglement Between Right and Power: Public Trial in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 公开审判既是被告人的权利,也是社会公众的权利,甚至包含国家的诸多权力利益。综合权衡之下,刑事审判应以公开为原则,不公开为例外。在具体操作中,则以比例原则为核心,注意公正审判、公众知情权、被告人负担、政府利益等多元诉求的平衡。以此观之,中国当下刑事审判实践中存在不公开范围界定不清、不当限制公开对象、公开程度被人为限制或过度公开等现实问题,有必要以公开审判的基本属性及比例原则为依据加以规范。 The right to a public trial belongs not only to the accused and the general public, but concerning multiple government interests as well. A careful balance requires that criminal trials be open to the public with applicably prescribed exceptions. The principle of proportionality shall prevail in practice, balancing multiple interests including the defendant' s burden and the right to a fair trial, the public' s right to information together with the government interests. Criminal trials in China sometimes are inappropriately restricted, either in terms of the constituents of audience or degree of openness, and sometimes are displayed to an excessive degree fur- thering extrajudicial purposes. Necessary regulatory actions shall be taken to bring the current practice back in accordance with the fundamental nature of public trial and the principle of proportionality.
作者 兰荣杰
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第1期35-43,共9页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"优化审判权与审判管理权配置的理论和实践研究"(12CFX052) 教育部留学归国人员启动基金项目"法院审判权配置与诉讼公正研究" "钱江人才计划"项目(QJC1202007)
关键词 审判公开 权利 权力 比例原则 public trim right power principle of proportionality
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Harold Shapiro, Right to a Public Trial, 41 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 782 (1952).
  • 2Jones'Blackstone1983 (1916).
  • 3Bentham, Rationale of Judicial Evidence 355 (1827).
  • 4Wigmore, Evidence See. 1834 (3rd Ed. 1940).
  • 5Campbell and Fell v united Kingdom (1984) (Appl.Nos. 7819/77 and 7878/77, 28 June 1984.
  • 6Press - Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of California, 464 U. S. 501 (1984).
  • 7~ Singer vs. U. S., 380U. S. 24, 35 (1965).
  • 8Anthony l~wis, A Public Right to Know about Public Institutions: The First Amendment as Sword, 1 Supreme Court Re- view 1 (1980).
  • 9Richmond Newspapers Inc. vs. Virginia, 448 U. S. 555 (1980).
  • 10《伊犁州公开审判危害国家安全犯罪案件涉案19人》,http://www.xjks.gov.cn/Item/2335.aspx,2015年10月20日访问.

共引文献295

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部