期刊文献+

格标记的形态编码与语言配列模式的蕴涵共性 被引量:2

The Morphological Coding of the Markedness of Cases and Implicational Universals of the Language Patterns
原文传递
导出
摘要 从跨语言的视角来看,格标记因其所附属名词短语的句法功能会出现不同程度的隐现情况。根据不及物句的必要论元(S)、及物句的施事性论元(A)以及受事性论元(P)格标记的不同形态编码方式,语言的配列模式可以形成特有的"四缺一"格局。通过观察,可以发现格标记意义上的语言配列模式的倾向性蕴涵共性:在A与P的标记不共现且S与A或P中一方匹配标记的前提下,如果S使用显性形态标记,那么S倾向于与A匹配格标记,这是语言的经济性和象似性两个动因共同作用的结果。研究结论为语言类型学的语法关系项等级序列提供了逻辑依据,也为施格格局语言配列模式的"主语"判定问题提供了一个新的研究思路。 From a typological perspective, the molphological coding of case marking varies due to different syntactic functions of the noun phrases to which case markers are attached, with either o,lert or covert marking. There are different alignments among the single argument of an intransitive predicate (S), the agent argument of a transitive verb (A) and the patient argument of a two-place transitive verb (P) in the morphological coding of case marking, thereby creating a tetrachoric table of language patterns. The present study finds one implicational universal concerning language patterns : given the non of the case marking of A and P as well as the same marking of S with A or P, if S is coded in overt form, S tends to have the same case marking with A. This universal results from the interaction of iconicity and economy of language. The study provides some logical support for the Hierarchy of Grammatical Relations, and a new perspective on the standards of subject in a typological sense, especially on those of the ergative languages.
作者 王遥 李景娜
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期44-54,共11页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 格标记 语言配列模式 蕴涵共性 语法关系项等级 case marking language patterns implicational universal Hierarchy of Grammatical Relations
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Anderson, S. R. On the notion of subject in ergative languages [ C ] //Li, C. Subject and Topic. New York : Academic Press, 1976.1 - 23.
  • 2Bechert, J. Ergativity and the constitution of grammatical relations [ C ] // Plank, F. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London : Academic Press, 1979.45 - 59.
  • 3Bennet, C. E. A Latin Grammar (Revised Edition) [ M]. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1908.
  • 4Blake, B. J. Case ( Second Edition) [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • 5Brown, L. A Grammar of Nias Selatan [ D ]. Sydney: University of Sydney, 2001.
  • 6Butt, M. Theories of Case [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • 7Chesterman, A. On Definiteness: A Study with Special Reference to English and Finnish [ M]. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 1991.
  • 8Comrie, B. Ergativity [ C ] //Lehmann, W. P. Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language. Austin : University of Texas Press, 1978. 329 - 394.
  • 9Comrie, B. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (Second Edition) [ M ]. Chicago: University of Chica- go Press, 1989.
  • 10Comrie, B., Haspelmath, M. & B. Bickel. Leipzig glossing rules [ J/OLJ. 2008. [ 2014 - 04 - 8 ] http ://www. eva. mpg. de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules, php.

二级参考文献75

同被引文献78

  • 1陆丙甫.从宾语标记的分布看语言类型学的功能分析[J].当代语言学,2001,3(4):253-263. 被引量:67
  • 2罗天华.SOV语言宾格标记的考察[J].民族语文,2007(4):21-29. 被引量:10
  • 3Hoshi,H. 1999. Passives[ A]. In N. Tsujimura (ed.). The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics[ C]. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 4天野みどり.2011.日本語構文の意味と類推拡張[M].東京:笠間書院.
  • 5奥湾敬一郎.1967.自動詞化·他動調化および両極化転形[J] .国語学,(70):46 -66.
  • 6加藤重広.2006a.対象格と場所格の連続性:格助詞試論(2)[J].北海道大学文学研究科紀要,(118): 135 -182.
  • 7加藤重広.2006b.二重ヲ格制約論[J].北海道大学文学研究科紀要, (119): 19 -41.
  • 8金水敏.1993.古典語の「ヲ」について[A].仁田義雄編.日本語の格をめぐって[C].東京:くろしお出版.
  • 9小島憲之,木下正俊,東野治之.校注·訳.1994.高葉集①(全四冊)新編日本古典文学全集6[M].東京:小学館.
  • 10小島憲之,木下正俊,東野治之.校注·訳.1995.高葉集②(全四冊)新編日本古典文学全集7[M].東京: 小学館.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部