摘要
对不同等级身高标准体重的大学生应对方式进行比较分析。由分析可知:男大学生在逃避纬度中,营养不良与较低体重组得分低于正常体重组,退缩纬度中,营养不良组得分低于正常体重组;女大学生在转移纬度中,营养不良与较低体重组得分高于正常体重组,求助、问题解决纬度中,营养不良组得分高于正常体重组,逃避纬度中,营养不良与较低体重组得分低于于正常体重组,压抑、退缩纬度中,营养不良组得分低于正常体重组。最后得出结论:应加强对营养不良与较低体重类别大学生应对方式的干预,而营养不良类别女大学生是干预的重点。
It is aim to provide basis for the intervention of coping style college students with different levels of height and standard weight,Results:( 1) With male college students,the score of malnutrition group and the lower body weight group are lower than the normal weight group in escape latitude; the score of Malnutrition group is lower than the normal weight group in retreat latitude.( 2)With female college students,the score of malnutrition group and the lower body weight group are higher than the normal weight group in transfer latitude; the score of malnutrition group is higher than the normal weight group in help and the problem solving latitude; the score of malnutrition group and the lower body weight group are lower than the normal weight group in escape latitude; the score of malnutrition group is lower than the normal weight group in depression and retraction latitude. Conclusion: We should strengthen the intervention of coping style of the students with malnutrition and the lower body weight students,and the female students are the focus of the intervention.
出处
《林区教学》
2016年第2期82-84,共3页
Teaching of Forestry Region
基金
校社科基金项目(12yckkw012)