期刊文献+

治疗中期^(18)F-FDG PET/CT与初诊弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者疗效及预后的相关性 被引量:5

Prognostic value of interim ^(18)F-PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨初诊弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,DLBCL)患者治疗中期18氟-氟代脱氧葡萄糖-PET/CT(18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-PET/CT,18F-FDG-PET/CT)的预后判断价值。方法 :回顾性分析69例初诊DLBCL患者的临床资料。所有患者均接受R-CHOP/CHOP方案一线治疗,且化疗前及化疗3个疗程后均接受PET/CT检查(分别命名为PET0和PET3),计算肿瘤病灶的最大标准化摄取值(maximum standardized uptake value,SUVmax)。应用受试者工作特征曲线确定PET0至PET3的SUVmax下降指数[ΔSUVmax(PET0-3)]的最佳分界值。Pearsonχ2检验、Kaplan Meier法及COX比例风险模型评价ΔSUVmax(PET0-3)与治疗前临床特征及疗效的关系,以及对无进展生存(progression-free survival,PFS)和总生存(overall survival,OS)的判断价值。结果:ΔSUVmax(PET0-3)预测DLBCL患者疾病进展的最佳分界点为80%。ΔSUVmax(PET0-3)与血清乳酸脱氢酶水平、Ann Arbor分期和国际预后指数密切相关。ΔSUVmax(PET0-3)≥80%组的完全缓解率及总有效率均显著高于<80%组;ΔSUVmax(PET0-3)≥80%组的3年PFS率及OS率均显著优于<80%组(3年PFS率:86.5%vs 44.1%,P=0.000;3年OS率:95.2%vs 68.6%,P=0.004)。多因素生存分析结果显示,ΔSUVmax(PET0-3)<80%是影响患者PFS和OS的独立预后因素(PFS:P=0.000,风险比为8.301;OS:P=0.016,风险比为7.191)。结论:接受R-CHOP/CHOP方案治疗的初诊DLBCL患者,以ΔSUVmax PET0-3)作为评判标准的治疗中期PET/CT是预测PFS和OS的重要因素,对患者的危险度分层具有重要的临床价值。 Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the prognostic value of interim 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL).Methods: The data of 69 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with R-CHOP or CHOP regimen were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had a PET/CT scan at diagnosis(PET0) and an interim PET/CT after the third cycle of chemotherapy(PET3). The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off value of Δmaximum standardized uptake value(SUVmax)(PET0-3). Pearson chi-square test, Kaplan–Meier method and COX proportional hazard model were performed to analyze the correlation of ΔSUVmax(PET0-3) with pretreatment clinical factors and its prognostic value in predicting efficacy, progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS).Results: The optimal cut-off value of ΔSUVmax(PET0-3) to predict disease progression in DLBCL patients was 80%. ΔSUVmax(PET0-3) between groups significantly differed with respect to serum lactate dehydrogenase(LDH), Ann Arbor stage and International Prognostic Index. Complete response rate and overall response rate were differed significantly between the ΔSUVmax(PET0-3) ≥ 80% and 80% groups. ΔSUVmax(PET0-3) analysis(≥ 80% vs 80%) identified patients with significantly different survival(3-year PFS: 86.5% vs 44.1%, P = 0.000; 3-year OS: 95.2% vs 68.6%, P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that ΔSUVmax(PET0-3) 80% independently predicted PFS and OS(PFS: P = 0.000, hazard ratio: 8.301; OS: P = 0.016, hazard ratio: 7.191).Conclusion: Interim PET/CT using a ΔSUVmax-based criteria was associated with survival outcome and might be useful for risk stratification of patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL receiving firstline R-CHOP/CHOP therapy.
出处 《肿瘤》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期194-201,共8页 Tumor
基金 上海市进一步加快中医药事业发展三年行动计划(2014-2016年)(编号:ZY3-CCCX-3-3037) 上海市浦东新区卫生和计划生育委员会卫生行业科研专项(编号:PW2015E-1)~~
关键词 淋巴瘤 大B细胞 弥漫性 正电子发射断层摄影术 氟脱氧葡萄糖F18 预后 Lymphoma large B-cell diffuse Positron-emission tomography Fluorodeoxyglucose Fl 8 Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma[J]. J ClinOncol, 2007, 25(5):579-586.
  • 2Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non- Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification[J]. J ClinOncol, 2014, 32(27):3059-3068.
  • 3Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues[M]. 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2008.
  • 4Coiffier B, Thieblemont C, Van Den Neste E, et al. Long-term outcome of patients in the LNH-98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab-CHOP to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL patients: a study by the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de I'Adulte[J]. Blood, 2010, 116(12):2040-2045.
  • 5Gisselbrecht C, Glass B, Mounier N, et al. Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era[j]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(27):4184-4190.
  • 6A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The International Non-Hodgkin' s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project[J]. N Engl J Med, 1993, 329(14):987-994.
  • 7Huang HH, Xiao F, Chen FT, et al. Reassessment of the prognostic value of the International Prognostic Index and the revised International Prognostic Index in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A multicentre study[j]. Exp ?-her Med, 2012, 4(3):475-480.
  • 8Guti~rrez-Garcfa G, Cardesa- Salzmann T, Climent F, et al. Gene- expression profiling and not immunophenotypic algorithmspredicts prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy[J]. Blood, 2011, 117(18):4836-4843.
  • 9Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, et al. Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods?D]. J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19(2):414-419.
  • 10Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS, et al. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: Consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma[J]. J ClinOncol, 2007, 25(5):571-578.

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部