期刊文献+

基于图的不一致容忍语义下的查询应答方法 被引量:1

A Graph-Based Approach for Query Answering Under Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本体在演变的过程中常出现不一致性问题,这将导致经典的推理模式失效.不一致容忍语义能有效地解决推理失效的问题,但各类不一致容忍语义或者需要耗费大量计算,或者丢弃了本体中有效的信息.为此,一种针对IAR-语义和ICAR-语义的变种被用以解决上述的缺陷.新定义的IPAR-语义能够避免计算整个ABox关于TBox的封闭,在减少计算量的同时尽可能地保留了本体中的信息.在IPAR-语义下实现了基于图的查询应答方法,新方法将本体和查询以不同的规则构建成图,避免了传统重写导致的查询冗余的问题.最后,通过实验对比新的查询应答方法与ICAR-语义下的查询应答方法,实验结果表明:基于图的一致性查询方法执行效率要优于ICAR-语义下的查询方法;在本体规模不断增加的情况下,新方法具有更好的稳定性. Inconsistency often occurs during ontology evolution, and leads to the invalidity of standard reasoning. To tackle this problem, inconsistency-tolerant semantics can be provided for the target language. However, ill-defined inconsistency-tolerant semantics may cost massive calculation and result in losing valuable information. In this paper, a variant of classical inconsistency-tolerant semantics is proposed, named IPAR-semantics. The newly defined inconsistency-tolerant semantics can avoid computing the closure of an ABox w.r.t. the corresponding TBox, thus can reduce the computation time and reserve as much information as possible. Based on the newly defined inconsistency-tolerant semantics, we further propose an approach for consistent query answering based on graph. In our approach, the given ontology and the target query are both transformed into graphs by different rules and stored into graph database. The IPAR-semantics ensure that the inconsistent instances cannot be included in the answering of query and the new approach can avoid redundant rewritings of a user query. Finally, We conduct comparative experiments on the ontologies generated by UOBM generator. In the experiments, we implement the query answering system under IPAR-semantics using our graph-based approach and compare it with the query answering approach under ICAR-semantics. The experimental results show that our approach outperforms in both efficiency and scalability.
出处 《计算机研究与发展》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期303-315,共13页 Journal of Computer Research and Development
基金 国家"八六三"高技术研究发展计划基金项目(2015AA015406) 国家自然科学基金项目(61272378) 江西省教育厅科研项目(GJJ12643)~~
关键词 本体 不一致容忍 DL-Lite 查询应答 ontology inconsistency-tolerant DL-Lite graph query answering
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Gruber T R. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications [J]. Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, 5 ( 2 ) : 199-220.
  • 2万长林,史忠植,胡宏,张大鹏.基于本体的语义Web服务QoS描述和发现[J].计算机研究与发展,2011,48(6):1059-1066. 被引量:9
  • 3贾存鑫,胡伟,柏文阳,瞿裕忠.SMap:基于语义的关系数据库模式与OWL本体间映射方法[J].计算机研究与发展,2012,49(10):2241-2250. 被引量:5
  • 4M, Lenzerini M. Data quality in ontology-based data access: The case of consistency [C]//Proc of the 28th AAAI Conf on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). Menlo Park, CA: AAA1, 2014:1020--1026.
  • 5Carnielli W A, Mareos J. Ex contradietione non sequitur quodlibet [J]. Bulletin of Advanced Reasoning and Knowledge, 2001, 1: 89-109.
  • 6周丽平,黄厚宽,漆桂林,瞿有利,季秋.一种在DL-Lite中计算本体最小不可满足保持子集的算法[J].计算机研究与发展,2011,48(12):2334-2342. 被引量:6
  • 7Schlobach S, Cornet R. Non standard reasoning services for the debugging of cleseription logic terminologies[C]//Proc of the 18th Int Joint Coal 9n Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2003: 355-362.
  • 8Zhang Xiaowang, Xiao Guohui, Lin Zuoquan, et al. Inconsistency-tolerant reasoning with OWL DL[J]. Int Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2014, 55(2): 557-584.
  • 9Bertossi L E, Hunter A, Schaub T. Introduction to inconsistency tolerance [C] //LNCS3300: Inconsistency Tolerance 2005. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005: 1-14.
  • 10Lembo D, Lenzerini M, Rosati R, et al. Inconsistencytolerant semantics for description logics [C]//Proc of the 4th Int Conf on Web Reasoning and Rule System. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010:103-117.

二级参考文献62

  • 1史忠植,董明楷,蒋运承,张海俊.语义Web的逻辑基础[J].中国科学(E辑),2004,34(10):1123-1138. 被引量:71
  • 2许卓明,董逸生,陆阳.从ER模式到OWL DL本体的语义保持的翻译[J].计算机学报,2006,29(10):1786-1796. 被引量:22
  • 3Mcllraith S A, Son T C, Zeng H. Semantic Web services [J]. IEEE Internet Systems, 2001, 16(2): 46-53.
  • 4Zhou Chen, Chia Liangtien, Lee Busung. DAML-QoS ontology for Web services [C]//Proc of the IEEE Int Conf on Web Services. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2004:472-479.
  • 5Dobson Glen, Lock R, Sommerville Ian. QoSOnt: A QoS ontology for service-centric systems [C]//Proc of the 31st EUROMICRO Conf on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications. Piseataway, NJ: IEEE, 2005:80-87.
  • 6Kritikos K. , Plcxousakis D. Semantic QoS metric matching [C] //Proc of the 4th European Conf on Web Service. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2006:265-274.
  • 7Kritikos K, Plexousakis D. Semantic QoS based Web service discovery algorithms [C]//Proc of the 5th European Conf on Web Service. Piseataway, NJ: IEEE, 2007:181-190.
  • 8Horrocks lan, Patel Schneider Peter F, Harold Boley, et al. SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWl. and RuleML[EB/OL]. [2005-05-21]. http://www. w3. org/ Submission/SWRL/.
  • 9Kumar V. Algorithms for constraint-satisfaction problems: A survey [J]. AI Magazine, 1992. 13(1) : 32-41.
  • 10Ma Qian, Wang Hao, Li Ying, et al. A semantic QoS-aware discovery framework for Web services [C]//Proc of the IEEE Int Conf on Web Service. Piseataway, NJ: IEEE, 2008: 129-136.

共引文献17

同被引文献12

  • 1Schlobach S, Huang Z, Cornet R, et al. Debugging incoher- ent terminologies [ J ]. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2007,39(3) :317-349.
  • 2Fu Xuefeng, Qi Guilin, Zhang Yong, et al. Graph-based ap- proaches to debugging and revision of terminologies in DL- Lite [ J ]. Knowledge Based Systems,2016,100 (5) : 1-12.
  • 3Schlobach S, Cornet R. Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies [ C ]. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,2003 : 355-362.
  • 4Lembo D, Lenzerini M, Rosati R, et al. Query rewriting for inconsistent DL-Lite ontologies [ C ]. Heidelberg: Spring, 2011 : 155-169.
  • 5Bienvenu M. Inconsistency-tolerant conjunctive query an- swering for simple ontologies[ EB/OL]. [2016-03-15 ]. http ://www. ceur-ws, org/Vol-846/paper._29, pdf.
  • 6Calvanese D, De Giacomo G, Lembo D, et al. Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description log- ics : the DL-Lite family [ J ]. Journal of Automated reason- ing, 2007,39 ( 3 ) : 385-429.
  • 7Bienvenu M. On the complexity of consistent query an- swering in the presence of simple ontologies [ C ]. Palo Al- to: AAAI Press,2012:705-711.
  • 8Lembe D, Lenzerini M, Rosati R, et al. Inconsistency-toler- ant semantics for description logics [ C ] Heidelberg: Sp, ringer-Vedag ,2010 : 103-117.
  • 9Poggi A, Lembo D, Calvanese D,et al. Linking data to on- tologies [ J ]. Journal on Data Semantics, 2008,10 ( 1 ) : 133-173.
  • 10周丽平,黄厚宽,瞿有利.一种面向DL-Lite本体原子断言的不一致度量算法[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),2010,46(2):115-121. 被引量:3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部