期刊文献+

儿童晕厥:定量计分诊断和危险分层 被引量:8

Syncope in children:quantitative diagnosis and risk stratification
原文传递
导出
摘要 对晕厥患儿临床评估的主要目的是病因诊断和危险分层。晕厥的病因或为良性或具有潜在的生命危险,有效的诊断和危险分层方法对于鉴别晕厥患儿近期及远期预后至关重要,并能减少不必要的住院。近年来,根据临床病史、体格检查和心电图提出的定量计分诊断和危险分层方法(如Calgary晕厥症状评分,旧金山晕厥规则),有助于医务工作者作出正确的临床决策,尤其为判断晕厥患儿是否需要住院治疗提供有价值的指导,但这些方法不能替代医务人员的临床评估及判断。 To management of syncope in children and adolescents, the primary objectives are etiological diag- nosis and risk stratification. The possible causes for syncope ranging from relatively benign conditions to potentially life - threatening events. The efficient methods of diagnosis and risk stratification are vital important to identify those syncope patients who are at short - term or long - term risk of life - threatening events, avoiding unnecessary hospitali- zation of low - risk patients. In recent years, there came up with a multitude of quantitative methods in diagnosis and risk stratification,according to clinical history and physical exam and 12 -lead electrocardiograph. These methods can assit front - line physicians do an optimal decision - making, especially providing valuable guidance to make a well - in- formed choice between hospitalization and outpatient referral. Nevertheless, these existing methods can not replace criti- cal assessment by an experienced physician.
作者 王成
出处 《中华实用儿科临床杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期6-9,共4页 Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
基金 湖南省发展改革委员会课题[湘财企指(2015)83号]
关键词 晕厥 临床病史 定量计分 危险分层 Syncope Clinical history Quantitative Risk stratification
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1陈丽,陈建军,唐朝枢,杜军保,金红芳.自主神经介导性晕厥儿童的心率变异性研究(附29例分析)[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2010,25(2):136-138. 被引量:8
  • 2GanzeboomKS,ColmanN,ReitsmaJB,et al.Prevalence and triggers of syncope in medical students[J].Am J Cardiol,2003,91(8):1006-1008.
  • 3del RossoA,UngarA,MaggiR,et al.Clinical predictors of cardiac syncope at initial evaluation in patients referred urgently to a general hospital:the EGSYS score[J].Heart,2008,94(12):1620-1626.DOI:10.1136/hrt.2008.143123.
  • 4SheldonRS,GrubbBP,OlshanskyB,et al.2015 heart rhythm society expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome,inappropriate sinus tachycardia,and vasovagal syncope[J].Heart Rhythm,2015,12(6):e41-63.DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.029.
  • 5WielingW,van DijkN,de LangeFJ,et al.History taking as a diagnostic test in patients with syncope:developing expertise in syncope[J].Eur Heart J,2015,36(5):277-280.DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu478.
  • 6DipaolaF,CostantinoG,SolbiatiM,et al.Syncope risk stratification in the ED[J].Auton Neurosci,2014,184:17-23.DOI:10.1016/j.autneu.2014.04.002.
  • 7SheldonR.Syncope diagnostic scores[J].Prog Cardiovasc Dis,2013,55(4):390-395.DOI:10.1016/j.pcad.2012.10.011.
  • 8SheldonR.How to differentiate syncope from seizure[J].Cardiol Clin,2015,33(3):377-385.DOI:10.1016/j.ccl.2015.04.006.
  • 9SheldonR,RoseS,RitchieD,et al.Historical criteria that distinguish syncope from seizures[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,40(1):142-148.
  • 10张清友,杜军保,齐建光,韩玲,李万镇.小儿心源性晕厥的临床特征分析[J].中华儿科杂志,2009,47(1):44-47. 被引量:22

二级参考文献37

共引文献47

同被引文献62

引证文献8

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部