期刊文献+

Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Catheter Drainage versus Open Laparotomy with Temporary Closure for Treatment of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome in Patients with Early-stage Severe Acute Pancreatitis 被引量:7

Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Catheter Drainage versus Open Laparotomy with Temporary Closure for Treatment of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome in Patients with Early-stage Severe Acute Pancreatitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This study aimed to examine the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous catheter drainage(PCD) versus open laparotomy with temporary closure in the treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome(ACS) in patients with early-stage severe acute pancreatitis(SAP). Clinical data of 212 patients who underwent PCD and 61 patients who were given open laparotomy with temporary closure in our hospital over the last 10-year period were retrospectively analyzed, and outcomes were compared, including total and post-decompression intensive care unit(ICU) and hospital stays, physiological data, organ dysfunction, complications, and mortality. The results showed that the organ dysfunction scores were similar between the PCD and open laparotomy groups 72 h after decompression. In the PCD group, 134 of 212(63.2%) patients required postoperative ICU support versus 60 of 61(98.4%) in the open laparotomy group(P〈0.001). Additionally, 87(41.0%) PCD patients experienced complications as compared to 49 of 61(80.3%) in the open laparotomy group(P〈0.001). There were 40(18.9%) and 32(52.5%) deaths, respectively, in the PCD and open laparotomy groups(P〈0.001). In conclusion, minimally invasive PCD is superior to open laparotomy with temporary closure, with fewer complications and deaths occurring in PCD group. This study aimed to examine the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous catheter drainage(PCD) versus open laparotomy with temporary closure in the treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome(ACS) in patients with early-stage severe acute pancreatitis(SAP). Clinical data of 212 patients who underwent PCD and 61 patients who were given open laparotomy with temporary closure in our hospital over the last 10-year period were retrospectively analyzed, and outcomes were compared, including total and post-decompression intensive care unit(ICU) and hospital stays, physiological data, organ dysfunction, complications, and mortality. The results showed that the organ dysfunction scores were similar between the PCD and open laparotomy groups 72 h after decompression. In the PCD group, 134 of 212(63.2%) patients required postoperative ICU support versus 60 of 61(98.4%) in the open laparotomy group(P〈0.001). Additionally, 87(41.0%) PCD patients experienced complications as compared to 49 of 61(80.3%) in the open laparotomy group(P〈0.001). There were 40(18.9%) and 32(52.5%) deaths, respectively, in the PCD and open laparotomy groups(P〈0.001). In conclusion, minimally invasive PCD is superior to open laparotomy with temporary closure, with fewer complications and deaths occurring in PCD group.
出处 《Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Medical Sciences)》 SCIE CAS 2016年第1期99-105,共7页 华中科技大学学报(医学英德文版)
关键词 versus decompression laparotomy closure temporary deaths experienced mortality physiological median versus decompression laparotomy closure temporary deaths experienced mortality physiological median
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献1

共引文献1287

同被引文献54

引证文献7

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部