摘要
"古史辨运动"的兴起是否受到了日本"疑古"思潮的直接影响,近年来逐渐成为学术界共同关注的一个话题,时至当下尚未盖棺论定。从现有资料来看,"古史辨运动"兴起之际的胡适、钱玄同、顾颉刚虽然通过间接方式对日本"疑古"思潮中的一些情况,如《崔东壁遗书》新校印本的出版、白鸟库吉的"尧舜禹抹杀论"、先秦天文历法论战以及内藤湖南的"加上原则"有所了解,但了解并不等于受其直接影响。要之,"古史辨运动"与日本"疑古"思潮之间并不存在实质性的学缘关系。
In recent years,many scholars have offered their opinions on whether or not the Doubting Antiquity movement led by Hu Shi and Gu Jiegang of the early 20 th century was inspired by the studies in Meiji Japan. Yet no consensus has been reached. From what we know as of today,Hu Shi,Gu Jiegang as well as Qian Xuantong might have certain knowledge of some Japanese studies of Chinese antiquity,such as the annotated Cui Dongbi's Posthumous Writings,Shiratori Kurakichi's denial of the historicity of Yao,Shun and Yu,the debate on the pre-Qin calendar and Nait? Konan's'Add-on Principle. 'But it remains unclear if the Doubting Antiquity movement was indebted to the above Japanese studies. In a nutshell,there seemed no direct connection between the historical Pyrrhonism of Meiji Japan and the debates on Chinese high antiquity by the scholars in Republic China.
出处
《史学理论研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期39-52,158,共14页
Historiography Bimonthly
