388名国有企业职工D型人格与认知融合的关系

Correlation between type D personality and cognitive fusion in 388 employees of state-owned enterprises

目的分析388名国有企业职工D型人格与认知融合的关系，为D型人格的心理干预提供理论基础。方法采用整群随机抽样的方法，于2014年5月从2家国有企业参与健康检查的职工中随机选择自愿参与测试的400人作为调查对象，通过认知融合问卷（CFQ）、D型人格问卷（Tvpe D Personality Scale，DS-14）进行测试。结果社交抑制组（25．62±8．92）、无消极情感无社交抑制组（20．58±8．26）认知融合平均分明显低于D型人格组（32．38±9．66），差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）；无消极情感无社交抑制组认知融合平均分明显低于消极情感组（31．96±10．20）和社交抑制组，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）；社交抑制组认知融合平均分明显低于消极情感组，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）；D型人格子维度消极情感（r=0．599）及社交抑制（r=0．392）与认知融合均呈正相关（P〈0．01）；消极情感（AF=211．484，P〈0．05）对认知融合具有解释作用。结论该企业员工中D型人格者与非D型人格者的认知融合存在差异，D型人格的社交抑制子维度与认知融合相关，D型人格的消极情感子维度与认知融合相关且能够解释认知融合。

Objective To investigate the correlation between type D personality and cognitive fusion in 388 employees from state-owned enterprises, and to provide a theoretical basis for psychological intervention for type D personality. Methods In May 2014, cluster random sampling was used to randomly select 400 employees from two state-owned enterprises who underwent physical examination and were willing to participate in the test. The test was performed with Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire（CFQ） and Type D Personality Scale（DS-14）. Results The social inhibition group and the group without negative affectivity and social inhibition had a significantly lower mean cognitive fusion score than the type D personality group （25.62±8.92/20.58±8.26 vs 32.38±9.66, P 〈 0.01）. The group without negative affectivity and social inhibition had a significantly lower mean cognitive fusion score than the negative affectivity group （31.96±10.20） and the social inhibition group （P〈0.01）. The social inhibition group had a significantly lower mean cognitive fusion score than the negative affectivity group （P〈0.05）. In the employees with type D personality, the subscales negative affectivity and social inhibition were positively correlated with cognitive fusion（r=0.599 and 0.392, P〈0.01）. Negative affectivity（AF= 211.484, P〈0.05） played a role in explaining cognitive fusion. Conclusion In the employees of state-owned enterprises, cognitive fusion is different between those with type D personality and those without type D personality. In the employees with type D personality, social inhibition and negative affectivity are correlated with cognitive infusion, and negative affectivity plays a role in explaining cognitive fusion.