期刊文献+

领导-成员交换对工作-家庭平衡的影响机制研究:工作弹性能力的中介作用及工作弹性意愿的调节作用 被引量:18

The Effect of Leader-Member Exchange on Work-Family Balance: The Mediating Role of Work Flexibility-ability and Moderating Role of Work Flexibility-willingness
原文传递
导出
摘要 企业界对于工作弹性从最开始的一面倒的支持声音到后来的不断质疑引起了学术界的重视。为了探究工作弹性对工作家庭平衡(WFB)的作用机制,本研究引入了领导-成员交换概念,探究工作弹性在领导-成员交换与工作家庭平衡中所起到的作用过程。本研究对十三家企业的20名员工进行个体访谈,再对280名(预测)及862名(正式测验)员工进行问卷调研。首先从自然界生态平衡的角度出发,采用因素分析方法挖掘出WFB的五个结构:抵御、转化、反馈、补偿和调节,同时开发并修订其本土化量表;然后采用层次回归分析发现领导-成员交换(LMX)对工作弹性有正向显著作用;最后通过结构方程检验出工作弹性能力中工作自主性和分享型工作氛围中介LMX与WFB的关系,工作弹性意愿正向调节工作自主性与WFB的关系。以上结论为今后开展对工作-家庭平衡的研究提供了理论基础。 The fact that once widely supported flexible work arrangement is increasingly questioned has attracted the attention of academia. In order to explore the functional mechanism of work flexibility to work-family balance ( WFB ), this research introduces leadermember exchange (LMX) to explore the intermediary variable and regulating variable of work flexibility on the relationship between LMX and WFB. For this purpose, 20 employees from 13 enterprises are individually interviewed and a questionnaire survey is made to 280 employees (for prediction) and 862 employees (for formal test) respectively. Based on the ecological balance of nature theory, this research sorts out five structures: defense, conversion, feedback, compensation and adjustment and meanwhile develops a localization inventory; then it uses hierarchical regression modeling to find that LMX has a significant positive effect on work flexibility; finally, it applies structural equation modeling to verify that job autonomy and a sharing atmosphere in work flexibility form a partial mediator between LMX and WFB and that work flexibility-willingness has positive moderating effects on the relationship of job autonomy and WFB. The conclusions above provide a theoretic foundation for the work-family balance in the future.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期138-148,共11页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71072088 71372145)
关键词 工作-家庭平衡 领导-成员交换 工作弹性 工作弹性能力 工作弹性意愿 work-family balance, leader-member exchange, work flexibility, work flexibility-ability, work flexibility-willingness
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Jain S., Nair S. K. Research on Work-Family Balance: A Review[J]. Business Perspectives and Research, 2013,2(1):43-58.
  • 2Greenhaus J. H., Beutell N. J. Sources of Conflict between Work and Family Roles[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1985,10(1):76-88.
  • 3Werbel J., Walter M. H. Changing View of Work and Family Roles: A Symbiotic Perspective[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2002,12(3):293-298.
  • 4Greenhaus J. H., Powell G. N. When Work and Family Are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006,31(1):72-92.
  • 5王永丽,叶敏.工作家庭平衡的结构验证及其因果分析[J].管理评论,2011,23(11):92-101. 被引量:27
  • 6Lingard H. C., Francis V., Turner M. Work-Family Enrichment in the Australian Construction Industry: Implications for Job Design[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2010,28(5):467-480.
  • 7Galea C., Houkes A., De Rijk A. An Insider's Point of View: How a System of Flexible Working Hours Helps Employees to Strike a Proper Balance Between Work and Personal Life[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2014,25(8):1090-1111.
  • 8Major D. A., Morganson V. J. Coping with Work-Family Conflict: A Leader-Member Exchange Perspective[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2011,16(1):126-138.
  • 9Clark S. C. Work/Family Border Theory: A New Theory of Work/Family Balance[J]. Human Relations, 2000,53(6):747-770.
  • 10Aryee S., Srinivas E. S., Tan H. H. Rhythms of Life: Antecedents and Outcomes of Work-Family Balance in Employed Parents[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005,90(1):132-146.

二级参考文献112

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55

共引文献1381

同被引文献211

引证文献18

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部