期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹近端胃癌根治术对患者疗效比较分析 被引量:8

Laparotomy and laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in treating proximal gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜与开腹近端胃癌根治术对近端胃癌患者疗效。方法将2012年7月至2014年7月收治的80例近端胃癌患者随机分为腹腔镜组40例和开腹组40例,采用SPSS19.0统计学软件进行分析,患者术中、术后指标采用x珋±s表示,用t检验;术后1年生存率、肿瘤复发率比较采用χ2检验;手术前后凝血功能指标、血清肿瘤标志物采用重复测量方差分析,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果腹腔镜组手术时间显著高于开腹组,术中出血量、排气时间、术后下床时间均显著低于开腹组(P<0.05),两组患者淋巴结清扫数量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后凝血酶原时间(PT)呈降低趋势,纤维蛋白原(FIB)、D-二聚体(D-D)呈上升趋势,与手术前比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中术后腹腔镜组纤维蛋白原、D-二聚体显著高于同时段开腹组,两组间比较差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组1年生存率97.5%(39/40),开腹组为95.0%(38/40);腹腔镜组1年复发率5.0%(2/40),开腹组7.5%(3/40),两组患者术后1年生存率、肿瘤复发率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜与开腹近端胃癌根治术近期疗效无明显差异,但是腹腔镜术后血栓形成的风险更高,需要在围手术期采取相应预防措施。 Objective To investigate the outcome of laparotomy and laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in treating proximal gastric cancer. Methods Eighty patients with proximal gastric cancer were randamly divided into a laparoscopic group (40 patients ) and an open group (40). Clinical data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software. Perioperative measurement data were expressed as mean ± SD and examined using Student' s t test. The one-year survival and recurrence rates were compared by the Chi-square test. Preoperative, postoperative coagulation function and serum tumor marks were examined by repeated variance analysis. P 〈 0. 05 was considered statistically significant. Results The operation time in the laparoseopic group was longer than that in the open group, whereas the amount of bleeding, time of exhaust and time ambulation were shorter than those in the open group (P 〈 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in harvested lymph nodes between the two groups (P 〉 0.05 ). Compared with preoperative indexes, PT showed a decreasing trend, but D-D and FIB showed a raising trend after surgery in the two groups ( P 〈 0. 05 ). FIB and D-D in the laparoscopic group were significantly higher than those in the open group (P 〈0.05). The 1-year survival rates in laparoscopic group and open group were 97.5% (39/40) and 95.0% (38/40) respectively, whereas the recurrence rates were 5.0% (2/40) and 7.5% (3/40) respectively (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Laparoscopic operation and laparotomy for gastric cancer have similar short-term clinical outcomes; however the risk of thrombosis after laparoscopic operation is higher, thus preventive treatment is required for selective patients perioperatively.
作者 李茂恒
出处 《中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)》 2016年第1期30-32,共3页 Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 胃肿瘤 腹腔镜检查 剖腹术 胃切除术 Stomach deoplasms Laparoscopy Laparotomy Gastrectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献146

  • 1卫洪波,魏波,郑宗珩,郑峰,邱万寿,郭卫平,陈图锋,王天宝.全胃切除术后三种消化道重建术式的比较研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(4):301-304. 被引量:40
  • 2刘玉珍,张震宇,郭淑丽.妇科开腹与腹腔镜手术后下肢静脉血栓形成的临床分析[J].现代妇产科进展,2006,15(8):622-623. 被引量:29
  • 3陈大荣,宋伟勇,吴益夫.下肢深静脉血栓形成后肺栓塞的防治[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(22):2644-2646. 被引量:7
  • 4Patel M T, Hardman D T A, Nicholls D, et al. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis after laparoscopic holecystectomy [J]. MJA, 2001,164 ( 11 ) : 652-654.
  • 5Schaepkens Van Riempst J T, Van Hee R H, Weyler J J. Deep venous thrombosis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and prevention with nadroparin [J]. Surg Endosc, 2002,16( 1 ) : 184-187.
  • 6Kuroiwa M, Arai M, Kinoshita S, et al. Clinical characteristics of perioperative pulmonary thromboembolism :analysis of 18 patients in Kitasato University Hospital [ J ]. Masui, 2002,51 (9) : 977-982.
  • 7Kinoshita H, Hara M, Maruyama Y, et al. A case of pulmonary embolism after abdominal angiography [J ]. Kurume Med J, 2004,51 (1):95-98.
  • 8The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.Guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer [G]. 2nd ed. Tokyo: Kanehara, 2004.
  • 9The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.Guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer[M].2nd ed,Tokyo:Kanehara,2004:61-6.
  • 10Kinoshita H,Hara M,Maruyama Y,et al.A case of pulmonary embolism after abdominal angiograghy[J].Kurume Med J,2004;51(1):95-8.

共引文献123

同被引文献85

引证文献8

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部