无实际被假冒对象的销售假冒注册商标商品行为不宜入罪--以“梅兰日兰”商标案为例

Trademark without the Counterfeit Objects Should not be Charged:Based on a Case of Selling Commodity Bearing Counterfeit Registered Trademark

对于商标权人并未将其注册商标使用于核定使用的具体某种商品,而行为人假冒或销售此种商品的行为如何认定,有必要深入论析。根据我国刑法和现有司法解释的精神,以及商标犯罪保护法益的客观评价标准,即使被假冒的商标客观存在,但是在无实际被假冒商品的情况下,假冒商品并不会挤占实际商品的市场占有份额,更不会给商标权人造成具体的经济损失,因此,这样的行为不应予以入罪。

If there are no commodities that use the registered trademark in reality, how to judge the action that someone products or sells commodities bearing counterfeit registered trademark is worth studying and discussing. In light of the Criminal Law and the current judicial interpretation of our country, the legal interests being protected by trademark crimes laws and so on, even there is a registered trademark, if there exists no commodities bearing registered trademarks, the counterfeit commodities could not crowd out the market shares, and will not cause the loss of the trademark owners＇ interests. Therefore, action like this should not be declared guilty.