“宋案”中之袁世凯——何曾主谋刺宋

Yuan Shikai in Song Case:Not the Chief Instigator in Assassinating Song

百年宋案研究最大的问题,在于错将"宋案"等同于"刺宋案"。实际上,宋案是由收抚共进会、解散"欢迎国会团"、构陷"孙黄宋"、低价购买公债、刺杀宋教仁等多个环节次第演进而成的复杂案件。袁世凯主导了前三个环节,但与后两个环节无关。不仅原始证据可以证明这一点,当时政情也表明袁世凯无刺宋必要。赵秉钧卷入了前三个环节,但同样与后两个环节无关。洪述祖和赵秉钧关系并不融洽,但和袁世凯有特殊关系,他与所有环节都有重要关系,刺杀宋教仁更是其擅自唆使应夔丞所为。案发后,袁世凯之所以故纵洪述祖至青岛德国租界,又阻止赵秉钧出庭自证清白,并非因为他是刺宋主谋,而是因为他要防止宋案其他案情在法庭公开,从而给本已受到冲击的正式大总统竞选造成更大影响。

The most crucial misconception of Song case is that researchers mistook Assassination of Song Case for Song Case. In fact, Song case is a complicated one evolving from summoning Progressive Association to surrender, dissolving ＂parliament welcome group＂, making up ＂Sun Huang Song＂ plan, buying national debt at extremely low price and assassinating Song. Former three plots were led by Yuan. But latter two had nothing to do with him. Hong did not get along well with Zhao, but he had close relation with Yuan and was involved in all these plots. Assassination of Song was especially under his instigation of Ying Kuicheng. Although after the assassination, Yuan set Hong free to German settlement in Qingdao and prevented Zhao from going to court to prove his innocence, Yuan did this not because he was the chief instigator in killing Song, but out of fear for further impact on his running for president if more details of Song case go public m the court.