期刊文献+

新常态下产业结构变动与经济增长——基于省级动态面板数据的GMM方法 被引量:11

Changes in Industrial Structure and Economic Growth under the New Normal Condition——Based on Provincial Dynamic Panel Data Model with GMM Estimation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新常态下,正确处理好稳增长与调结构的关系,有重要的政策含义。文章通过构建NAV、MLI两个不同的产业结构变动指数,基于省级1993-2013年的面板数据,运用GMM方法进行了实证检验。结果表明:从全国范围来看,短期内,产业结构变动与经济增长之间存在双向格兰杰因果关系,而较长时期内,仅存在经济增长到产业结构变动的单向格兰杰因果关系。其次,从省级层面来看,产业结构变动与经济增长之间的格兰杰因果关系表现出很大的异质性。基于此结论,文章认为,产业政策并不具有较长时期有效性,产业政策的制定需要视期限、地区的不同而择机、择时制定;同时,要规避产业政策缺陷带来的不足,规避"结构负利"的出现。 Under the new normal condition, there is an important policy implication to appropriately handle the relationship between steady growth and structural adjustment. Two different industrial structure change indices of NAV and MLI are built in this paper based on the provincial-level panel data from 1993 to 2013 and they are verified through empirical test with GMM method. The results reveal that throughout the whole nation, in short term, there exists a two-way Granger causality relation between the industrial structure change and economic growth; in relatively long term, there exists only a single-way Granger causality relation from economic growth to industrial structure change. Moreover, from the provincial-level, great heterogeneity has been found in the Granger causality relation between industrial structure change and economic growth. Based on the conclusion above, it is argued in the paper that the industrial policies are not effective in long term and the formulation of the industrial policies is selected and decided depend on period of term, different regions, time and opportunities ; meanwhile, to avoid the deficiency caused by the defect of the industrial policies, efforts should be made to avoid the presence of "structural negative profit".
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期58-67,共10页 Journal of Business Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目"新产业革命的发展动向 影响与中国的应对战略研究"(13&ZD157)
关键词 经济增长 产业结构变动 广义矩估计 格兰杰检验 economic growth industrial structure changes Generalized Method of Moments(GMM) Granger causality test
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1林毅夫.新结构经济学——重构发展经济学的框架[J].经济学(季刊),2010,9(4):1-32. 被引量:546
  • 2袁富华.长期增长过程的“结构性加速”与“结构性减速”:一种解释[J].经济研究,2012,47(3):127-140. 被引量:219
  • 3世界银行.世行报告《2030年的中国》[R/OL].(2012-05-03)[2015-06-15].http://wenku.baidu.com/view/7db67c2e915t804d2b16c17e.html.
  • 4吕健.产业结构调整、结构性减速与经济增长分化[J].中国工业经济,2012(9):31-43. 被引量:89
  • 5SILVA E G,TEIXEIRA A A C. Surveying Structural Change: Seminal Contributions and a Bibliometric Account [J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2008,19 ( 4 ) : 273-300.
  • 6KRUGER J J. Productivity and Structural Change : A Review of the Literature [J]. Journal of Economic Surveys,2008,22 ( 2 ) : 330-363.
  • 7DIETRICH A. Does Growth Cause Structural Change,or Is It the other Way around? A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis for Seven OECD Countries[J]. Empirical Economics,2012,43 ( 3 ) :915-944.
  • 8PENDER M. Industrial Structure and Aggregate Growth [J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics ,2003,14 (4) :427-448.
  • 9DING S, KNIGHT J. Why Has China Grown So Fast? The Role of Structural Change [EB/OL]. ( 2011-02-12 ) [2015 - 05 - 301. http ://ideas. repec, org/p/zbw/gdec09/7, html.
  • 10ORCAN C, NIRVIKAR S. Structural Change and Growth in India [J]. Economics Letters, 2011,110 ( 3 ) : 178-181.

二级参考文献219

共引文献1850

同被引文献148

引证文献11

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部