期刊文献+

2种对比剂用于冠状动脉造影的药物经济学研究

Pharmacoeconomic Study of 2 Contrast Reagents Used for Coronary Arteriography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨国产碘海醇注射液与进口碘普罗胺注射液用于冠状动脉造影的成本与效果,为遴选安全、有效、经济的药物,降低医疗成本和医疗费用提供参考。方法按随机、双盲、对照试验原则将200例行冠状动脉造影的患者分为碘海醇组(试验组)和碘普罗胺组(对照组),运用最小成本分析法、成本-效果分析法对2种对比剂的效果和治疗费用进行分析。结果 2种对比剂的影像对比度、使用剂量、不良反应发生率比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 2种对比剂用于冠状动脉造影检查,疗效可靠,安全,国产对比剂更经济,可很好地替代进口对比剂,满足社会对提高医疗质量,降低医疗成本和医疗费用的要求。 Objective To investigate the cost and efficacy of domestic iohexol and imported lopromidefor coronary arteriography using ap- plied pharmacoeconomics principles to select a safe, effective and economical reagent to reduce the cost of treatment. Methods A dou- ble- blinded randomized controlled test was conducted in 200 patients with coronary arteriography. They were divided into the routine coronary angiography iohexol group (experimental group) and iopromide group (control group). The results were evaluated with cost- minimization analysis and cost- effectiveness analysis. Results There were no significant differences between the 2 contrast reagents on image contrast, dosage and adverse events rate(P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Both reagents are effective and safe for coronary arteriography test; however the domestic reagent is more economical. It can replace the imported reagent to meet the requirement of improving medical quality at lower cost, maximize the economic benefits with limited health resources.
作者 侯杰
出处 《中国药业》 CAS 2016年第3期79-81,共3页 China Pharmaceuticals
关键词 碘对比剂 冠状动脉造影 药物经济学 contrast media coronary arteriography pharmacoeconomics
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献51

  • 1吴新民,薛张纲,王俊科,叶铁虎,赵晶.围术期过敏反应诊治的专家共识[J].中国继续医学教育,2011,3(10):129-130. 被引量:34
  • 2CHANCE研究组.无保护左主干病变支架置入术预后及影响因素的分析——中国无保护左主干病变支架置入术注册(CHANCE)研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(3):210-215. 被引量:19
  • 3全国eGFR课题协作组.MDRD方程在我国慢性肾脏病患者中的改良和评估[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2006,22(10):589-595. 被引量:702
  • 4Eric L Eisenstein, DBA,Kevin J. Anstrom, PhD,David F. Kong, MD,Linda K. Shaw, MS,Robert H. Tuttle, MSPH,Daniel B. Mark, MD, MPH,Judith M. Kramer, MD, MS,Robert A. Harrington, MD,David B. Matchar, MD,David E. Kandzari, MD 1,Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH,Kevin A. Schulman, MD,Robert M. Califf, MD,李呈亿(译),David E. Kandzari, MD.氯吡格雷的使用与药物洗脱支架植入后远期临床结果[J].美国医学会杂志(中文版),2007,26(3):131-139. 被引量:59
  • 5吴久鸿,史宁.国内外药物经济学的研究热点与发展应用现状[J].药物评价,2010,7(2):44-48.
  • 6ACR Manual on Contrast Media version 9. ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. 2013.
  • 7Solomon RJ, Natarajan MK, Doucet S, et al. Cardiac angiography in renally impaired patients (CARE) study: a randomized double-blind trial of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease. Circulation, 2007, 115:3189-3196.
  • 8ESUR Guidelinesversion 8. ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee. 2012.
  • 9Lang DM, Alpern MB, Visintainer PF, et al. Elevated risk of anaphylactic reaction from radiographic contrast media is associated with both beta-blocker exposure and cardiovascular disorders. Arch Intern Med, 1993, 153:2033-2040.
  • 10Chen Y, Hu S, Liu Y, et al. Renal tolerability of iopromide and iodixanol in 562 renally impaired patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation: the DIRECT study. Eurlntervention, 2012, 22:830-838.

共引文献764

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部