期刊文献+

副舟骨损伤的MRI诊断价值 被引量:2

Diagnostic Value of MRI in Detection Accessory Navicular Bone Injures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨MRI对足副舟骨损伤的诊断价值。材料与方法:分析21例副舟骨损伤的临床和MRI资料。观察副舟骨的分型、骨质信号特点、纤维软骨联合、胫骨后肌腱以及周围软组织情况。结果:本组21例均为Ⅱ型副舟骨。MRI表现:主、副舟骨间的结合区为纤维软骨信号,6例结合区T2WI信号增高。20例主、副舟骨舟骨结合区共同出现骨髓水肿,1例单纯副舟骨出现骨髓水肿,7例结合区旁骨质可见小囊变。发现胫骨后肌腱鞘积液16例,周围非腱性软组织水肿12例。结论:MRI可以良好的反映副舟骨损伤的病理特点,对副舟骨损伤的诊断和治疗治疗方式选择中具有重要意义。 Purpose: To assess the value of magnetcic resonsance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of accessory navicular bone injures. Materials and Methods: The clinical and MRI characteristics of 21 cases with clinicals proved accesso- ry navicular bone injures were retrospectively analyized and the type of accessory, signal intensity of bone, fibrocartilaginous junction, posterior tibial tendon, and adjacent soft tisse were evaluated. Results: All 21 cases were type Ⅱ accessory navicualr bone . The signal of synchondroses in the region between the main and accessory navicular was observed , and high intensity signal of T2WI was seen in 6 cases. Marrow edema of the both sides of fibrocartilaginous junction between both navicular was found in 20 cases, and only accessory marrow edema was found in 1 case. Cystic change could be seen near the synchondrosis in 7 cases. Posterior tibial tendon shesth fluid was found in 16 cases. We could also detect adjacent swelling soft tissues in 12 cases. Conclusion: MRI could well reveal the pathology figures of accessory navicular bone injures and play an important role in diagnosis and therapy decision making in navicular bone injures.
出处 《现代医用影像学》 2015年第6期905-907,共3页 Modern Medical Imageology
关键词 副舟骨损伤 磁共振成像 Accessory navicular bone injury, Magnetcic resonsance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献68

  • 1程秀珍,丁建平,孙英彩,谢兰新,赵静品.足、踝部副骨的X线观察(附3000例分析)[J].中华放射学杂志,1995,29(5):339-340. 被引量:8
  • 2Coskun N, Yuksel M, Cevener M, et aL Incidence of accessory ossides and se.samoid bones in the feet= a radiographic study of the Turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat, 2009; 31(1):19-24.
  • 3Perdikakis E, Grigoraki E, Karantanas A. Os naviculare: the multi ossicle configuration of a nom~al variant. Skeletal Radiol, 2011; 40(1):85-88.
  • 4IV~ller "IT. Painful accesmry bones of the foot. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2002; 6(2) :15-161.
  • 5McKusick VA. Catalogs of autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X- linked phenotypes[A]. In: McKusick VA ed. Mendelian Inheritance in Man [M]. 2th ed, lMtimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1978:147.
  • 6Kiter E, Erduran M, Gtmal I. Inheritance of the ames,soU navicular bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2010; 120(11):582-583.
  • 7Dobbs MB, Walton T. Autommal dominant transmission of accessory navicular. Iowa Orthop .1, 2004; 24(24):84-85.
  • 8Coughlin MJ. Sernoids and aecesmry bones of the foot[A]. In: Coughlin MJ. Maran RA, hltzmea CL eds. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle[M]. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, 2007:531- 610.
  • 9Choi YS, Lee KT, Kang HS, et al. MR imaging findings of painful type Ⅱacces,mry navicular bone: correlation with surgical and pathologic studies. Korean J Radiol, 2004; 5(4):274-279.
  • 10Isever AS, M]nden K, E.shed I, et al. Accesmry navicular lone: when ankle pain does not originate from the ankle. Clin Rheurmtol, 2007; 26(12) :2143 -2144.

共引文献30

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部