期刊文献+

信贷规划管理下利率市场化改革对企业融资约束的影响

The Impact of Interest Rate Marketization Reform on Financial Constraints of China's Enterprises from the Perspective of Credit Management
原文传递
导出
摘要 大量的实证研究支持利率市场化改革具有缓解企业融资约束的作用。但是,中国近20年的利率市场化改革却始终难于解决企业融资难、融资成本高的问题。通过运用供求模型分析利率市场化改革对企业融资约束的影响,结果表明:在贷款利率开放、仅实施存款利率上限管理的阶段,央行严格的信贷规划在有效控制流动性过剩的同时也加剧了企业融资约束;而且当前通过放弃信贷规划管理缓解企业约束融资的功效并不明显,还有可能会加剧信贷市场偏离均衡的波动。因此,建议推进存款利率市场化改革,通过增加信贷资金供给来降低贷款利率水平,通过改变银行对国有企业的贷款偏好来缓解企业融资约束。 Large quantities of empirical researches prove the interest rate marketization helps to ease financial constraints on enterprises. However, the interest rate marketization reform over the past twenty years has not effectively dealt with the financing difficulties and the high financing cost for enterprises. This paper uses the model of supply and demand to analyze the impact of interest rate marketization reform on financial constraints of enterprises. The findings indicate when keeping a ceiling only on deposit rate with the loan rate open the central rate marketization reform, increasing the supply of credit funds to reduce loans rate, and changing banks' preference for state-owned enterprises to ease the financial constraints for enterprises.
作者 梁涛
出处 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期54-61,共8页 Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
关键词 利率市场化 利率管制 均衡利率 融资约束 信贷规划 interest rate marketization interest rate control equilibrium interest rate financial constraint lending plan
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Fazzari ,S. M. * Hubbard,R, G., Peterson,B. C."FinancialConstraints and Corporate Investment [J].Booking Papers onEconomic Activity, 1988.141 - 195.
  • 2Modigliani, F., Miller, M. ,The cost of capital, corporation fi-nance, and the theory of investment [J].American EconomicReview , 48 ( 3 )1958.261?297.
  • 3Greenwald,Bruce, Joseph ? Stiglitz, Andrew ? Weiss.Informationin perfections and macroeconomic [J].American EconomicReview (74),1984.194-199.
  • 4Myers Stew art C, Nicholas Majluf.Corporate financing andinvestment decisions when firms have information that in-vestors do not have [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 13.1984.187-221.
  • 5Bemamke, Ben, and Mark Gertler.Agency costs,net worth,and business fluctutions [J],American Economic Review,79.1989.14-31.
  • 6Gertler, M.Financial capacity and output fluctuation in andeconomy with multi -' period financial relation-ship [J].Re-view of Economic Studies,59(3), 1992.455-472.
  • 7Hoshi Kashyap Scharfstein. Gorprate structure liquidityand investment Evidence from Japanese panel data Quar-terly[J]. Journal of Economics,106,1991.33-60.
  • 8Calomiris, C.W. ,and B. G. Hubbard.Internal finance andinvestment; evidence from the undistributed profits tax of1936 - 37[J].Joumal of Business, 68,1995.443-484.
  • 9Jaewoon Koo and Sunwoo Shin.Financial Liberalization andCorporate Investments: Evidence from Korean Firm Data[J],Asian Economic Journal, 2004.277-292.
  • 10Gaston Gelos & Alejandro M. Wemer.Financial Liberaliza-tion, Credit Constraints, and Collateral [D].IMF WorkingPapers 99,25, International Monetary Fund, 1999.

二级参考文献81

共引文献923

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部