期刊文献+

债务约束下的企业广告与R&D投资研究 被引量:9

Advertising and R&D Innovation under Debt Constraint
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以Brander和Lewis的资本结构产业组织理论为基础,结合资本市场与产品市场,分析了企业负债与广告投资、R&D投资之间的关系。通过模型推导提出理论命题,并运用我国沪深两市A股上市公司数据进行验证得到相关结论。研究结果显示负债对企业广告投入存在刺激作用而对R&D投资存在抑制效应。企业广告投入与R&D投入行为存在明显的行业差异,制造业企业两种投入相对均衡,非制造业企业通常偏好于二者之一。企业广告与R&D投入之间相互影响,制造业两种投资之间存在互补关系,而非制造业两种投资之间存在替代关系。负债对企业广告与R&D投资行为的影响存在差异,并且不同债务类型的影响同样存在差异。本研究可进一步促进资本结构产业组织理论的发展,同时为企业改善广告与R&D投资策略提供理论和经验依据。 Combining output market with capital market and based on the capital structure industrial organization theory, how debt affects firm's advertising and R&D investment behavior along with what are the relationships between advertising and R&D innovation are studied in this paper. After theoretical and empirical analyzing, the following conclusions are achieved. Firstly, debt increases firm's advertising but inhibits R&D investment and different kinds of debts have different effects. Besides, firm's advertising and R&D behavior are different between different industries and manufacturing firms invest both of them while non-manufacturing firms only perform one of them. Moreover, advertising investment is complementary with RS&D investment in manufacturing firms but it is competitive with R&D innovation in non-manufacturing firms. This study is valuable for the improving of capital structure industrial organization theory and helpful for firm's advertising as well as R&D competition strategy.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期142-149,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271100) 国家社科基金重点项目(14AJY020) 广东省软科学项目(2014A070704008) 广东省社会科学基金资助项目(GD13YLJ02)
关键词 负债 广告投入 R&D投入 互补性 刺激效应 debt advertising investment R&D investment complementary stimulating effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Schumpeter J A.Capitalism,socialism and democracy [M],New York,Harper:Routledge,1942.
  • 2Hirschey M.Intangible capital aspects of advertising and R & D expenditures[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,1982,30(4):375-390.
  • 3William B.Correlations between advertising and R&D expenditures:Dealing with important intangibles[J].South African Journal of Science,2007,103:94-98.
  • 4Chauvin K W,Hirschey M.Advertising,R&D expend- itures and the market value of the firm[J].Financial Management,1993,22(4):128-140.
  • 5Brander J A,Lewis T R.Oligopoly and financial struc- ture:The limited liability effect[J].The American E- conomic Review,1986,76(5):956-970.
  • 6Maksitnovic V.Capital structure in repeated oligopolies [J].The RAND Journal of Economics,1988,19(3):389-407.
  • 7何枫,陈荣.R&D与广告对中日家电企业技术效率影响的比较研究[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(4):140-147. 被引量:12
  • 8Andras T L,Srinivasan S S,Advertising intensity and R&D intensity:Differences across industries and their impact on firm's performance[J].International Journal of Business and Economics,2003,2(2):167-176.
  • 9Ho Y K,Keh H T,Ong J M.The effects of R&D and advertising on firm value:An examination of manufac- turing and nonmanufacturing firms[C].IEEE Transac- tions on Engineering Management,2005,52(1):3-14.
  • 10Matraves C.Market structure,R&D and advertising in the pharmaceutical industry[R].The Journal of In- dustrial Economics,1999,47(2):169-194.

二级参考文献121

共引文献970

同被引文献88

引证文献9

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部