期刊文献+

考虑广告主信誉和用户体验的GSP机制研究 被引量:4

Research on the GSP Mechanism with Advertiser Reputation and User Experience
原文传递
导出
摘要 目前,竞标在线广告位是广大广告主宣传其产品的重要途径之一,在线广告位的拍卖已成为搜索引擎企业最主要的盈利手段之一。在国内,广告位拍卖机制的逐利本质诱发了大量的虚假广告,引发了公众的广泛争议;拥有高报价的广告主并不总是带给搜索引擎用户好的用户体验,这些问题已成为搜索引擎亟需解决的重要问题。本文提出了一种既考虑广告主信誉又考虑用户体验的可信有效竞价广告位拍卖机制,定义了在该机制下的对称纳什均衡,给出了广告主的均衡竞价策略,证明了在该均衡下的配置是有效率的。通过与单纯竞价GSP拍卖机制进行比较,我们发现用户的满意度得到了提高,这增加了搜索引擎的竞争优势。此外,本文的拍卖机制不仅有利于促进广告主提高信誉,在提高搜索引擎的长期均衡收益和拍卖效率方面也有一定的优势。通过数值模拟验证了我们的结论。 At present, the bid for online advertising position is an important way for many advertisers to promote their products, and online advertising position auction has become the most important means to make profits for the search engine. In our country, the profit-driven nature of the advertising position auction mechanism causes a large number of false advertising and a wide public controversy. Those advertisers with high bids do not always bring good experience to search engine users. This has become important issues needed to be solved by search engine. In this paper, a creditable effective auction mechanism is presented, considering not only the reputation of advertisers but also the experience of users. A symmetric Nash equilibrium is defined, characterizing the equilibrium bidding strategy of the advertisers and showing that the allocation is effective under our mechanism. Compared with the GSP mechanism of ranking only by bid, it is found that user satisfaction is improved, which increases the competitive advantage of the search engine. In addition, our mechanism may help to improve advertisers' reputation and has advantage in raising search engine's long-term balanced revenue and auction efficiency. Our conclusion is demonstra- ted by numerical simulation.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期150-156,共7页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171052) 对外经济贸易大学研究生科研创新基金资助(201310)
关键词 广告位拍卖 可信有效机制 广告主信誉 用户体验 position auction creditable effective mechanism advertiser reputation user experience
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1百度2012年年度财务报告[R].
  • 2http://baike.baidu.com/view/13086058.htm[Z].
  • 3Varian H R.Position auctions[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,2007,25(6):1163-1178.
  • 4Edelman B,Ostrovsky M,Schwarz M.Internet adver- tising and the generalized second price auction:Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords[J].American Eco- nomic Review,2007,97(1):242-259.
  • 5Borgers T,Cox I,Pesendorfer M,et al.Equilibrium bids in sponsored search auctions:Theory and evidence [J].American Economic Journal:Microeconomics,2013'5(4):163-187.
  • 6Gomes R,Sweeney K.Bayes-Nash equilibria of the gen- eralized second-price auction[J].Games and Economic Behavior,2014,86:421-437.
  • 7Lahaie S,Pennock D.Revenue analysis of a family of ranking rules for keyword auctions[C].Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce,Mich- igan,June 11-15,2007.
  • 8Abrams Z,Schwarz M.Ad auction design and user ex- perience[J].Applied Economics Research Bulletin,2008,(3):98-104.
  • 9Athey S,Ellison G.Position auction with consumer search[J],Quarterly Journal of Economics,2011,126(3):1213-1270.
  • 10张娥,汪应洛.关键字广告位拍卖的收益等价性研究[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(3):92-96. 被引量:22

二级参考文献95

共引文献55

同被引文献51

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部