期刊文献+

一致性条件与荷兰赌论证

The Consistency Condition and the Dutch Book Argument
下载PDF
导出
摘要 主观主义概率论者把概率看成私人的事情。概率即部分信念,而部分信念可以通过赌商来测定,概率的主观求值只受一致性条件约束,概率律就是一致性律。通过荷兰赌可以论证一个赌商集合不可能导致荷兰赌,当且仅当,这个赌商集合满足概率演算公理。因为概率演算规则被看作保证个人概率求值具有一致性的必要条件,所以依据荷兰赌论证,概率论的逻辑规律在主观主义的观点中被严格确立,主观概率理论具有了科学的主观基础。 Scholars who advocate subjective probability considered probability as a personal matter.Probability is partial belief,then partial belief could be measured by the betting quotient,and the subjective evaluation of probability could only be constrained by the condition of consistency,which reveals that the laws of probability are ones of consistency.Dutch Book Argument demonstrats that a set of gambling quotient could not lead to Dutch Book,if and only if,this set of gambling quotient accords with the axiom of the calculus of probabilities.Because the rules of the calculus of probability could be conceived as conditions necessary to ensure consistency among the evaluation of probability of individuals,according to arguing the Dutch Book Argument,the logical laws of the theory of probability can be rigorously established within the subjectivistic point of view and subjective probability theory is based on subjective basis of scientific.
作者 季爱民
机构地区 安徽师范大学
出处 《铜陵学院学报》 2015年第6期69-72,共4页 Journal of Tongling University
基金 安徽省高校人文社科研究重点项目(SK2014A256) 安徽师范大学研究生教育教学改革研究重点项目(2014-017)
关键词 主观概率理论 一致性条件 荷兰赌论证 subjective probability theory the consistency condition Dutch Book Argument
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献21

  • 1江天骥.科学哲学名著选读[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,1988..
  • 2John Maynard Keynes. A Treatise on Probability[M]. Lon- don: Macmillan and Co, 1921.
  • 3F. P. Ramsey,Edited by D. H. Mellor. Foundations-Essay in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics IMp. Lon- don and Henley: Routledge Kegan Paul, 1978 : 74.
  • 4[edited by] Henry E. Kyburg, Jr and Howard E. Smokler. Studies in Subjective Probability[M]. New York:Robert E. krieger Publishing Company, Inc, 1980 : 61.
  • 5Donald Gillies. Intersubjeetive Probability and Confirmation Theory[J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Sei- enee,1991,42(4) :513-533.
  • 6Donald Gillies. Philosophical Theories of Probability[M]. London and New York: Taylor & Francis Group Rout- ledge, 2000 : 57.
  • 7Schick,Frederic. Dutch Bookie and Money Pumps[J]. The Journal of Philosophy, 1986,83(2) :112--114.
  • 8Heilig,Klaus. Carnap and de Finetti on Bets and the Probability of Singular EventsThe Dutch Book Ar- gument Reconsidered[J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, t 978,29 (4) : 340.
  • 9Ryder,J. M. Consequences of a Simple Extension of the Dutch Book Argument[J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1981,32(2) :166.
  • 10Christensen, David. Dutch- Book Arguments Depragrna- tized:Epistemic Consistency for Partial Believers[J]. The Journal of Philosophy,1996,93(9).

共引文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部