期刊文献+

利益相关者视角的复杂产品系统企业风险传导机制研究——以经济下行情境下的船舶企业为例 被引量:4

Research on Risk Transferring Mechanism of CoPS Firms from the Stakeholders' Perspective:Case Study of Shipyards in the Context of Economic Downturn
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现有对复杂产品系统企业风险的研究主要集中于复杂特性对风险的作用,极少关注环境变化和利益相关者利己行为的影响。本研究以不同的视角,探索环境发生巨大变化时,利益相关者的利己机会主义行为与复杂产品系统企业风险的关系。采用多案例研究方法,对后金融危机时代船舶企业的风险事件进行了分析。研究发现:1环境变化引起的利益相关者权力与利益的失衡是复杂产品系统企业风险产生的根源;2复杂产品系统企业风险具有传导特征,传导路径为"环境变化—利益相关者权力与利益失衡-机会主义行为-集成商风险后果产生"的层次递进式过程。本研究还进一步明晰了复杂产品系统企业的主要外部利益相关者及各自的风险传导路径。 The focus of existing studies about CoPS firms is mainly on how complexities impact on risks, while little attention is paid to the impacts of the changing of environment and the self-in-terest behaviors of stakeholders. Different from existing research, the purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between the risk of CoPS firms and the stakeholders' self-interest oppor- tunist behaviors when the environment undergoes significant changes. The paper analyzes risk in- cidents encountered by shipyards in the environment of the post-financial-crisis era by the method of multi-case study. The study finds that:①The root source of CoPS firm's risk is the imbalance between the rights and the interests of CoPS stakeholders caused by the changing of environment; ②The CoPS firm's risk has the characteristic of transferability, and the transferring mechanism begins from environment change, to the imbalance between the power and the benefit of stake- holders, and then opportunist behaviors, and finally the occurrence of risk results of CoPS frim, which is a layered and progressive process. This study also finds out the main external stakehold- ers of CoPS firm and the risk transferring path of each stakeholder.
出处 《管理案例研究与评论》 CSSCI 2015年第6期513-524,共12页 Journal of Management Case Studies
基金 辽宁省教育厅2014年度科学研究一般项目(W2014275) 辽宁对外经贸学院2015年度博士基金启动项目(2015XJLXBSJJ001)
关键词 复杂产品系统 利益相关者 风险传导机制 船舶企业 环境变化 Complex Product Systems (COPS) stakeholders risk transferring mechanism ship-yard the changing of environment
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Heighes T. Quantitative indicators for complex product systems and their value to the UK econo- my[C. Conference Paper for 7th International Forum on Technology Management, Kyoto, 19 9 7.
  • 2陈劲,景劲松,童亮.复杂产品系统创新项目风险因素实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2005,17(6):62-69. 被引量:25
  • 3国务院.关于加快培育和发展战略性新兴产业的决定[EB/OL].国发[2010]32号,2010-10-10.
  • 4Breznitz D, Murphree M. Run of the red queen: Government,innovation globalization and economic growth in China [M]. New Haven: Yale Universi- ty Press,2011.
  • 5Davies A, Hobday M, Ebrary I. The business of projects:Managing innovation in complex products and systems [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge Univer- sity Press,2005.
  • 6Hobday M, Rush H. Technology management in complex product systems (COPS) Ten questions answered [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 1999,17(6) :618-638.
  • 7Hansen K L,Rush H. Hotspots in complex product systems: Emerging issues in innovation manage ment[J]. Technovation, 1998, 18 (8/9)= 555-561, 589-590.
  • 8Xu Z,Li H B. Assessing performance risk for com plex product development: A simulation-based model[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering In- ternational, 2013,29 : 267-275.
  • 9Abhulimen K E. Model for risk and reliability analysis of complex production systems Applica- tion to FPSO/flow-riser system[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2009, 33 ( 7 ) : 1306 1321.
  • 10Kujawski E, Angelis D. Monitoring risk response actions for effective project risk management[J]. Systems Engineering, 2010,13 (4) : 353 363.

二级参考文献216

共引文献128

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部