1Saywer, K. Analyzing collaborative discourse[M]. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.) Cambridge I-landlx)ok of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006 : 187 - 204.
2Jordan, B & Henderson, A. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice[M]. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1995,4 (1) : 39 - 103.
3Sfard, A. In Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizlng[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University,2008: Introduction.
4Greeno, J. G. learning in activity[C]//In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press , 2006 : 79 - 96.
5Greeno, J. G. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research[J ]. American Psychologist, 1998,53 ( 1 ) : 5 - 26.
6Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K. & Gravemeijer, K.. Participating in classroom mathematical practices [ J ]. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2001,10( 1 &2) : 113 - 163.
7Gravemeijer & Cobb. Design research from a learning design perspective[C]// In Jan van den Akker, Koeno Gravemeijer, Nienke Nieveen, Susan McKenney (Ed.). Educational Design Research. Routledge, London& New York,2006:17-51.
8Barab, S & Kirshner. Guest editors' introduction: Rethinking methodology in the learning sciences [ J ]. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2001,10 ( 1 &2) : 5 - 15.
9Barab, S Hay & Yamagatea- Lynch. Constructing networks of action- relevant episodes: An in situ research methodology[J]. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2001, 10 ( 1 &2 ) : 63 - 112.
10Yamagata- Lynch, L. C. Confronting analytical dilemmas for understanding complex human interactions in design - based research from a Cultural- Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) framework[J]. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2007, 16 (4): 451-484.
