期刊文献+

前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者不行腋窝淋巴结清扫预后的Meta分析 被引量:1

A Meta-analysis of the prognosis of sentinel node-positive breast cancer patients forgoing axillary lymph node dissection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价不行腋窝淋巴结清扫对前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者预后的影响。方法系统检索Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆中的相关文献,所有检索截至2014年4月。由2位评价员独立筛选并提取数据资料,对符合纳入标准的研究使用RevMan5软件进行统计学分析。结果共检索到1026篇文献摘要,通过筛选最终纳入18个临床对照研究,病例总数为47894例,其中前哨淋巴结微转移组7389例,宏转移组35217例,前哨淋巴结阳性未区分宏转移与微转移组5288例。结果显示,微转移患者,仅行前哨淋巴结活检组与行腋窝淋巴结清扫组相比,5年腋窝复发率、5年无瘤生存率和5年总体生存率差异无统计学意义,OR值分别为1.78(95%C1:0.72~4.39,P=0.21),0.76(95%CI:0.56~1.04,P=0.08),0.77(95%CI:0.43—1.40,P=0.39);宏转移患者,仅行前哨淋巴结活检组与行腋窝淋巴结清扫组相比,5年腋窝复发率差异无统计学意义,OR值为1.21(95%CI:0.76~1.91,P=0.42);前哨淋巴结阳性未区分宏转移与微转移患者,仅行前哨淋巴结活检组与行腋窝淋巴结清扫组相比,5年腋窝复发率和5年整体生存率差异无统计学意义,OR值分别为1.29(95%CI:0.92~1.80,P=0.14),0.96(95%CI:0.64~1.45,P=0.84)。结论前哨淋巴结阳性不行腋窝淋巴结清扫术较行腋窝淋巴结清扫术对乳腺癌患者的远期生存无明显影响。 Objective To compare the prognosis of sentinel node-positive breast cancer patients forgoing axillary lymph node dissection. Methods A systematic literature search( Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library)ended in April 2014 was performed to identify all eligible articles. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. RevMan5 was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 1026 abstracts were retrieved and 18 clinical con- trolled studies finally included, the total number of patients were 47 894, 7389 had micrometastases in sentinel lymph node, 35 217 had macrometastases in sentinel lymph node and 5288 had positive sentinel lymph node regard- less of micrometastases or macrometastases. For patients with MIC, the 5- year axillary recurrence rate , 5- year dis- ease free survival and 5-year overall survival had no significant difference between patients who only received sentinel lymph node biopsy and patients who received further axillary lymph node dissection, ( OR = 1.78; 95% CI: 0.72-4.39, P=0.21),(OR=0.76, 95%CI: 0.56-1.04, P=0. 08),(OR=0.77, 95%CI: 0.43-1.40, P= 0.39). For patients with MAC, the 5- year axillary recurrence rate had no significant difference between patients who only received sentinel lymph node biopsy and patients who received further axillary lymph node dissection, ( OR = 1.21 ; 95% CI: O. 76-1.91, P =0.42). For patients with positive sentinel lymph node regardless of micrometastases or macrometastases, the 5-year axillary recurrence rate and 5-year overall survival had no significant difference between patients who only received sentinel lymph node biopsy and patients who received further axillary lymph node dissection, ( OR = 1.29 ; 95% CI: 0. 92-1.80, P = 0. 14) , ( OR = 0. 96, 95% CI: 0. 64-1.45, P = 0.84). Conclusions Among patients with limited positive SLN of breast cancer, patients forgoing ALND compared with ALND did not have obvious affect on long-term survival.
出处 《国际外科学杂志》 2015年第12期811-819,共9页 International Journal of Surgery
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 前哨淋巴结 微转移 宏转移 META分析 Breast neoplasm Sentinel lymph node Maerometastases Mierometastases Metaanalysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1Giuliano AE, Kirgan DN, Guenther JM, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer [ J]. Ann Surg, 1994, 220(3) : 391-398.
  • 2Abdessalam SF, Zervos EE, Prasad M, et al. Predictors of positive axillary lymph nodes after sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer[J]. Am J Surg, 2001, 182(4) : 316-320.
  • 3Jeruss JS, Winchester D J, Sener SF, et al. Axillary recurrence af- ter sentinel node biopsy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2005, 12( 1 ) : 34- 40.
  • 4de Boer M, van Deurzen CH, van Dijck JA, et al. Micrometasta- ses or isolated tumor cells and the outcome of breast caneer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361(7) : 653-663.
  • 5Maaskant-Braat A J, Van de Poll-France LV, Voogd AC, et al. Sentinel node micrometastases in breast cancer do not affect progno- sis :a population-based study [ J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2011, 127(1) : 195-203.
  • 6Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23 (30) : 7703-7720.
  • 7Galimberti V. International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial of sentinel node biopsy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24( 1 ) : 210-211.
  • 8Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: re- vised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of paral- lel group randomized trials[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2001, 1:2.
  • 9Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et aL Methodological index for non- randomized studies (minors) : development and validation of a new instrument[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2003, 73(9) : 712-716.
  • 10Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. hnproving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses [ J ]. Lancet, 1999, 354(9193): 1896-1900.

共引文献53

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部