期刊文献+

一次性根治术与传统手术治疗肛周脓肿对比分析 被引量:9

One-time Radical Surgery Versus Traditional Surgery in the Treatment of Perianal Abscess
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究一次性根治术治疗肛周脓肿的临床疗效。方法随机选择2013年3月—2014年3月该院45例肛周脓肿患者作为观察组,予以一次性根治术;随机选取2012年2月—2013年2月该院传统手术治疗肛周脓肿的45例患者作为对照组,观察并比较两组患者治疗效果、术后肛周疼痛情况。结果两组患者术后随访12个月,观察组患者治愈41例,延迟愈合4例,无患者复发;对照组患者治愈40例,3例延迟愈合,2例复发,两组患者治愈率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后肛周疼痛情况显著优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用一次性根治手术治疗肛周脓肿可有效减少复发率、缓解患者术后痛苦,提高患者满意度,值得于临床推广。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of one-time radical surgery in the treatment of perianal abscess. Methods 45 cases with perianal abscess admitted in our hospital from March 2013 to March 2014 were selected as the ob-servation group and treated by the one-time radical surgery, and other 45 cases with perianal abscess admitted in our hospi-tal from February 2012 to February 2013 were selected as the control group and treated by the traditional surgery. And the treatment effect, postoperative perianal pain of the two groups were observed and compared. Results Both groups were fol-lowed up for 12 months after surgery. In the observation group, 41 cases were cured, 4 cases had late healed, no recurrent case. In the control group, 40 cases were cured, 3 cases had late healed, the disease recurred in 2 cases. The difference in the cure rate between the two groups was not statistically significant(P〉0.05). The observation group had significantly lighter perianal pain than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion One-time radical surgery for perianal abscess can effectively reduce the recurrence rate, relieve the postoperative pain, improve patient satis-faction, so it is of worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 苗宗达
出处 《中外医疗》 2015年第32期44-45,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 一次性根治术 传统手术 肛周脓肿 疗效 One-time radical surgery Traditional surgery Perianal abscess Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献51

共引文献210

同被引文献45

引证文献9

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部