期刊文献+

体育领域男性与女性学者学术贡献差异统计分析——以《体育科学》(2006年~2014年)为例

Academic Contribution Difference between Male and Female Sports Scholars Statistical Analysis—Tanking the Sport Science( 2006 ~ 2014) as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用文献资料、数理统计、逻辑回归等研究方法,对体育领域男性与女性学者学术贡献影响因素进行统计分析,研究结果表明,从2006年~2014年男性和女性学者总发文1422篇,其中男性学者发文1028篇,占总数的72.29%,女性学者发文394篇,占总数的27.71%;《体育科学》刊文平均每篇被引15.62次,男性著作平均每篇被引16.76次,女性著作平均每篇被引12.58次,男性学者的学术贡献与女性学者的学术贡献存在显著差异,且男性的学术贡献高于女性的学术贡献;男性学者发文数量呈现逐年下降的趋势,女性学者发文数量呈现逐渐增加的趋势,男性与女性学者之间的学术贡献差距越来越小,打破了传统女性不能搞科研的观念. Using literature, mathematical statistics, logistic regression and other research methods, for male and female aca- demics Academic Contribution sports influencing factors were analyzed, the results showed that from 2006 to 2014 men and women scholars of the total issued 1422, male scholars issued 1028, accounting for 72.29% of the total, female scholars issued a docu- ment 394, accounting for 27.71 of the total; "Sports Science" published an article cited an average of 15.62 times of each, men work an average of 16.76 times of each citation, women work on average per cited articles 12.58 times, there are significant differ- ences academic Contribution male and female scholar academic contribution of scholars and academic contribution male than female academic contribution; the number of male scholars issued a document showing a declining trend, the number of female researchers issued a gradually increasing trend academic contribution gap between male and female scholars getting smaller, breaking the tradi- tional concept of women can not engage in scientific research.
出处 《宁夏师范学院学报》 2015年第6期103-109,共7页 Journal of Ningxia Normal University
基金 山东省研究生创新计划研究项目(SDYY15051)
关键词 体育 学术贡献 差异 Physical education Academic contribution Difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部