负压封闭引流技术与传统换药术在软组织损伤修复中的临床疗效及安全性对比研究

Comparison Study on the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum Sealing Drainage and Traditional Dressing in Soft Tissue Injury Repairing

目的分析比较负压封闭引流技术与传统换药术在软组织损伤修复中的临床疗效及安全性,探讨其临床适用性。方法选取2014年7月至2015年7月在我院就诊的126例皮肤软组织损伤患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组和实验组各63例。对照组给予传统换药术,实验组给予负压封闭引流技术。治疗后比较两组的临床疗效及安全性。结果实验组植皮愈合时间、住院时间、治疗后创面面积、换药次数均明显小于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组患者未出现并发症,对照组并发症发生率为7.94%,两组比较差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与传统换药术相比,负压封闭引流技术治疗皮肤软组织损伤的临床疗效更加显著,并发症发生率低,安全性更高,值得临床推广应用。

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of vacuum sealing drainage（VSD） technology and traditional dressing technology in soft tissue injury repairing, and to investigate its clinical applicability. Methods 126 cases of patients with skin soft tissue injury admitted to our hospital from July 2014 to July 2015 were selected and randomly divided into control group and experimental group, with 63 cases in each group. The control group was given traditional dressing technology, the experimental group was given VSD technology. The clinical efficacy and safety of two groups after treatment were compared. Results The skin-grafting healing time,hospitalization time, wound area after treatment, dressing change times of experimental group were significantly less than those of control group, with statistical difference（P〈0.05）. No complications were found in experimental group, but the incidence of complications in control group was 7.94%, the difference between two groups was statistical（P〈0.05）. Conclusions Compared with traditional dressing technology, vacuum sealing drainage technology has more significant clinical efficacy in treatment of soft tissue injury, and has low complications rate and high safety, which is worthy of promotion and application.