期刊文献+

综合评价卡:审核评估的新探索 被引量:3

Comprehensive Progress Report Card as a New Tool for Institutional Quality Audit in Jiangsu
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据国家评估改革方案,地方院校的审核评估下放至省级组织实施。某省在审核评估中试用了综合评价卡,作为写实性评估结论意见的一种标识和呈现方式。通过对院校内部质量保障状态的十个维度和各维度的五个达标程度的定性描述,并以坐标和曲线的形式直观表达院校所处的位置。这一创新实践既避免了以往教学水平评估的"优良中差"分等评估的弊端,也规避了新一轮教学工作审核评估结论出现过于大而化之、无法全面客观反映院校的整体实情的风险,受到专家的普遍肯定。未来拟帮助院校更加深入地理解和使用好综合评价卡,为其强化内部质量保障机制打造一个切实可行的专业工具。 Jiangsu Agency for Educational Evaluation adopts a comprehensive progress report card as an assessment tool in its recent institutional quality audit of two institutions of the Province. The report card consists of 10 dimensions of internal quality assurance plus 5 levels of attainment for each dimension. The status of the internal quality assurance of an audited institution is interpreted by a certain attainment level of each dimension,and it can also be expressed by a coordinates curve. In the two cases of institutional quality audit,the comprehensive progress report card has served as a useful tool for helping the auditors to make their judgments about the status of the internal quality assurance system of an audited institution. It can also be used as a framework for guiding institutions in data mining and conducting follow-up activities of continuous improvement.
作者 袁益民
出处 《常州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第6期82-86,共5页 Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 审核评估 综合评价卡 内部质量保障 institutional quality audit comprehensive progress report card internal quality assurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Cameron Kim,Wesley Sine.A framework for organizational quality culture[J].Quality Management Journal,1999,6(4):7-25.
  • 2Isaiah O Ugboro,Kofi Obeng.Top management leadership,employee empowerment,job satisfaction,and customer satisfaction in TQM organizations:an empirical study[J].Journal of Quality Management,2000(5):247-272.
  • 3袁益民.审核评估:如何真正做到正确认识,确保平稳开展[J].高教发展与评估,2015,31(1):1-16. 被引量:10

二级参考文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部