期刊文献+

心理护理对逆行胰胆管造影患者围手术期心理障碍的干预效果 被引量:20

The intervention effect of psychological nursing on the perioperative abnormal psychology patients treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨内镜下逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)患者围手术期精神心理特征,评价心理护理对ERCP患者围手术期心理障碍的干预作用,为制定ERCP患者围手术期心理护理方案提供科学依据。方法:将58例ERCP患者随机分为干预组30例和对照组28例,另选取24名健康者作为健康对照(健康组)。干预组和对照组分别于术前及术后采用综合医院焦虑/抑郁情绪测定量表(HAD)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)量表进行测评,并比较2组术后卧床时间和住院时间。健康组仅作心理状况评估。结果:ERCP组患者术前抑郁和焦虑评分均高于健康组(P〈0.01和P〈0.05);术前PSQI评分中,除催眠药物和日间功能障碍评分差异均无统计学意义外,其他各项评分均高于健康组(P〈0.05~P〈0.01)。干预组与对照组术前HAD和PSQI评分差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。术后,干预组焦虑及抑郁评分均低于对照组(P〈0.05和P〈0.01);PSQI评分除催眠药物、日间功能障碍因子评分与对照组差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)外,其余各项评分差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05~P〈0.01)。干预组术后卧床时间和住院时间均短于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论:行ERCP患者围手术期表现出焦虑、抑郁和睡眠障碍,心理护理可改善ERCP患者的心理障碍,并缩短卧床时间及住院时间。 Objective: To explore the psychological characteristics of the perioperative patients treated with endoscopic retrograde eholangiopancreatography(ERCP), evaluate the intervention effects of psychological nursing on the ERCP patients for providing scientific basis in formulating psychological nursing program. Methods:Fifty-eight patients treated with ERCP were randomly divided into the intervention group(30 cases) and control group(28 cases), and 24 healthy people were set as the healthy control group. The intervention group and control group were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) and Pittsburgh Sleep quality index scale(PSQI) before and after operation, the bed time and hospital stay after ERCP between the intervention group and control group were compared. The psychological status of healthy control group were evaluated. Results:The preoperative anxiety and depression scores in intervention group and control group were higher than those in healthy control group( P 〈 0.05 and P 〈 0.01 ). Among the preoperative PSQI scores, the differences of the scores of hypnotic drugs and daytime dysfunction between the intervention group and control group were not statistically significant( P 〉 0.05 ) ,and other item scores in intervention group and control group were higher than those in healthy control group (P 〈 0.05 to P 〈 0.01 ). The differences of the preoperative scores of HAD and PSQI between the intervention group and control group were not statistically significant( P 〉 0.05 ). The postoperative anxiety and depression scores in intervention group were lower than those in control group( P 〈 0.05 and P 〈 0.01 ). Except the scores difference of hypnotic drugs and daytime dysfunction,other item scores differences of PSQI scores between the intervention group and control group were statistically significant( P 〈 0.05 to P〈 0.01 ). The postoperative bed time and hospital stay in intervention group were shorter than those in control group( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions :The anxiety,depression and sleep disturbance are the main perioperative manifestations. Psychological nursing can significantly improve the psychological stress, reduce bed time and hospitalization time of patients.
出处 《蚌埠医学院学报》 CAS 2015年第12期1715-1717,1720,共4页 Journal of Bengbu Medical College
关键词 心理护理 内镜下逆行胰胆管造影 围手术期 心理应激 psychological nursing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography perioperative period psychological Stress
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献48

  • 1刘贤臣,唐茂芹,胡蕾,王爱祯,吴宏新,赵贵芳,高春霓,李万顺.匹兹堡睡眠质量指数的信度和效度研究[J].中华精神科杂志,1996,29(2):103-107. 被引量:3503
  • 2Jowell PS, Baillie J, Branch MS, et al. Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in en- doscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med, 1996,125:983 -989.
  • 3Schutz SM, Abbott RM. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty : a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastroi- ntest Endosc, 2000,51:535-539.
  • 4Verma D, Gostout C J, Petersen BT, et al. Establishing a true assessment of endoscopic competence in ERCP during training and beyond : a single-operator learning curve for deep biliary can- nulation in patients with native papillary anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc, 2007,65:394-400.
  • 5Cotton PB, Connor P, McGee D, et al. Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists. Gastrointest En- dosc, 2003,57:352-357.
  • 6Madhotra R, Cotton PB, Vaughn J, et al. Analyzing ERCP prac-tice by a modified degree of difficulty scale: a muhicenter data- base analysis. Am J Gastroenterol,2000 ,95 :2480-2481.
  • 7Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, et al. Risk factors for com- plications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 proce- dures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009,70:80-88.
  • 8Ragunath K, Thomas L. A simple grading scale to assess ERCP technical difficulty An attempt to produce qualitative outcome da- ta. Gastrointest Endosc,2001,55 : 195.
  • 9Johanson JF, Cooper G, Eisen GM, et al. Quality assessment of ERCP. Endoscopic retrograde chalangiopacreatography. Gastroi- ntest Endosc, 2002,56 : 165-169.
  • 10Garrow DA, Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB. Comparing ERCP prac- tice and outcomes by level of experience. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009,69:231.

共引文献2331

同被引文献148

引证文献20

二级引证文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部