摘要
该文尝试通过对近10年来9种中文类体育核心期刊所发表论文进行内容分析的角度来调查我国体育教学研究中研究方法运用的历史沿革和研究现状并探索其发展趋势。通过研究发现近10年来体育教学研究越来越多地强调学科交叉,同时学者们进行科学研究也越来越倾向于用具体的数据对观点和结论进行论证,而定性的方法可能已很难满足体育教学研究的需要,定性和定量相结合的方法越来越受到学者的青睐。近10年我国学者主要运用问卷调查法对原始资料与数据进行收集,同时由于近年来,研究中学科间的交叉渗透的趋势越来越明显,很多高等院校和科研机构的研究条件不断改善,很多自然科学如生理学、生物化学、生物力学、营养学、信息技术等学科在体育教学研究中的应用越来越多,使得实验法等原始资料与数据收集方法在体育教学研究中的应用也占有重要的地位。该文还对定量研究的论文中原始资料与数据的分析方法的运用情况进行了分析。
This paper attempts for the past I0 years by nine kinds of Chinese Physical Education Core journals published content analysis to investigate the perspective of teaching and research in the study of sports history and research of methods to use and explore its development trend. The research shows that nearly 10 years of teaching of PE increased emphasis interdisciplinary scientific research while scholars are increasingly inclined to use specific data views and conclusions to conduct feasibility studies and qualitative methods may have been difficult to meet sports teaching and research needs, a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods increasingly favored by scholars. The past I0 years China scholars mainly used questionnaires to collect raw data and data at the same time in recent years, research in interdisciplinary cross--penetration trends are becoming evident that many institutions of higher learning and research institutions continue to improve conditions for research, Many natural sciences such as physiology, biochemistry, biomechanics, nutrition, information technology and other disciplines applied in teaching and research, more and more sports, making the raw data and data collection methods, such as the experimental method used in teaching and research in sports also occupy important position. This paper also quantitative research papers in the case of the original data and the use of data analysis methods were analyzed.
出处
《当代体育科技》
2015年第28期6-7,9,共3页
Contemporary Sports Technology
基金
云南省教育科学研究基金项目
编号:2013C004
关键词
体育教学
研究方法
内容分析
定性研究
定量研究
Physical education
Research methods
Content analysis
Quantitative researehl Qualitative research