6Moscicki AB,Shiboski S,Hills NK, et al.Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women[J]. Lancet,2004,364(9446):1678 - 1683.
7Fadare O,Rodriguez R.The significance of marked nuclear atypia in grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J].Hum Pathol,2009,40(10):1487 - 1493.
8Cox JT, Schiffman M,Solomon D.Prospective follow-up sug- gests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2003.188(6"1:1406 - 1412.
9Kjaer SK,Frederiksen K,Munk C,et al.Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection:role of persistence[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2010,102(19): 1478 - 1488.
10Andersson S,Dillner L,Elfgren K,et al.A comparison of the human papillomavirus test and Papanicolaou smear as a second screening method for women with minor cytological abnormalities[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Stand,2005,84(10):996 - 1000.
