期刊文献+

友谊嫉妒问卷在中小学生中应用的效度和信度 被引量:3

Validity and reliability of the Friendship Jealousy Questionnaire in primary and middle school students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:在我国中小学学生中对友谊嫉妒问卷(FJQ)进行修订并考察其效度和信度。方法:选取中小学学生500人(样本1)施测FJQ,用于条目分析和探索性因子分析;另外选取中小学学生476人(样本2)施测FJQ,用于结构效度及内部一致性信度检验;从样本2中选取60人施测嫉妒量表(BSJS)的社会嫉妒维度、生活满意度量表(SWLS)检验效标效度。1个月后,随机选取样本1中的100人进行重测,检验重测信度。结果:经条目分析和探索性因子分析,删除5个条目,保留10个条目,10个条目的因子载荷均>0.65,因子累积解释问卷总变异量的50.81%;验证性因子分析结果表明模型拟合较好(χ2/df=2.57,CFI=0.95,TLI=0.94,IFI=0.97,RM SEA=0.06,SRM R=0.04);FJQ总分与BSJS社会嫉妒维度总分及2个因子得分呈正相关(r=0.48、0.47、0.40,均P<0.01),与SWLS得分呈负相关(r=-0.21,P<0.01)。问卷的内部一致性信度Cronbachα系数为0.88,组合信度为0.89,重测信度为0.88。结论:修订后的友谊嫉妒问卷具有良好的效度和信度,可以作为测量和评估我国中小学生友谊嫉妒的工具。 Objective: To revise the Friendship Jealousy Questionnaire (FJQ) in primary and middle school students and assess its validity and reliability. Methods: Totally 500 students were recruited to complete the test version for item and exploratory factor analysis in sample 1. Totally 475 students in sample 2 were tested with formal version for further confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency reliability and composite reliability. Sixty of sample 2 were selected randomly and asked to complete the dimension of social jealousy from Bringle Self-report Jealousy Scale (BSJS) and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). One hundred students from sample 1 were ran- domly chosen and retested for test-retest reliability with one month interval. Results: Five items were deleted by i- tem analysis and exploratory factor analysis, finally 10 items were included. The factor loading of 10 items were o- ver 0.65. The accumulating explanatory rate of the 10 items was 50. 81%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that FJQ had a good construct validity (x2/df= 2. 57, CFI = 0. 95, TLI = 0. 94, IFI = 0. 97, RMSEA = 0. 06, SRMR = 0. 04). The FJQ scores were positively correlated with the dimension of social jealousy scores and two factors (r = 0. 48, 0. 47, 0. 40, Ps 〈0. 01), and the FJQ scores were negatively correlation with the SWLS scores (r = -0. 21, P〈 0. 01). The Cronbach a coefficient of the FJQ was 0. 88, the composite reliability was 0. 89, the test-retest reliability was 0. 88. Conclusion: The Friendship Jealousy Questionnaire is a reliable tool to assess the friendship jealousy for Primary and secondary students in China.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期133-137,共5页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 黑龙江省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(12522093) 哈尔滨师范大学人文社会科学科研培育基金(10xskp09) 哈尔滨师范大学青年学术骨干资助计划项目(SGB201214) 沈阳师范大学博士科研项目启动基金资助
关键词 友谊嫉妒 效度 信度 中小学生 friendship jealousy validity reliability primary and middle school students
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Parrott W.Emotions in social psychology:essential readings[M].Philadelphia:Psychology Press,2001:142.
  • 2Bringle RG.Conceptualizing jealousy as a disposition[J].J Fam Econom Issues,1981,43(3):274-290.
  • 3Parker JG,Gamm BK.Describing the dark side of preadolescents'peer experiences:four questions(and data)on preadolescents'enemies[J].New Dir Child Adolesc Dev,2003,(102):55-72.
  • 4Mathes EW,Adams HE,Davies RM.Jealousy:loss of relationship rewards,loss of self-esteem,depression,anxiety,and anger[J].J Pers Soc Psychol,1995,48(3):1552-1561.
  • 5Pfeiffer SM,Wong PT.Multidimensional jealousy[J].J Soc Pers Relatsh,1999,47(6):181-196.
  • 6Salovey P,Rodin J.Envy and jealousy in close relationships[M].//Hendrick C.Close relationships.Newbury Park,CA:Sage,1989:221-246.
  • 7Sharpsteen DJ.Romantic jealousy as an emotion concept:a prototype analysis[J].J Soc Pers Relatsh,2003,10(3):69-82.
  • 8王晓钧.嫉妒反应结构模式与反应量表的同质性研究[J].心理科学,2001,24(2):157-159. 被引量:3
  • 9Guerrero LK,Andersen PA.The dark side of jealousy and envy:desire,delusion,desperation,and destructive communication[M].//Spitzberg BH,Cupach WR.The dark side of close relationships.Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum,1998:33-70.
  • 10胡芸,张荣娟,李文虎.嫉妒与自尊、一般自我效能感的相关研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(2):165-166. 被引量:25

二级参考文献56

  • 1王晓钧.嫉妒反应结构模式与反应量表的同质性研究[J].心理科学,2001,24(2):157-159. 被引量:3
  • 2王才康,胡中锋,刘勇.一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究[J].应用心理学,2001,7(1):37-40. 被引量:2593
  • 3王雁飞,朱瑜.心理资本理论与相关研究进展[J].外国经济与管理,2007,29(5):32-39. 被引量:277
  • 4汪向东 王希林 等.心理卫生评定量表手册[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.235.
  • 5Lutlians F, Lutlians KW, Lutlians BC. Positive Psychological capital: Beyond human and social capital. Business Horizons, 2004, 47(1): 45-50.
  • 6Luthans F, Youssef CM. Human, social and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 2004, 33: 143-160.
  • 7Larson M, Luthans F. Potential added value of psychological capital in predicting work attitudes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2006, 13:45-62.
  • 8Luthans F, Youssef CM. Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 2007, 33:321-349.
  • 9Goldsmith AH, Veum JB, Darity WJ. The impact of psychological and human capital on wages. Economic Inquiry, 1997, 35:815-829.
  • 10Cole K, Wellbeing. Psychological capital, and unemployment: An integrated theory. Paper presented at the joint annual conference of the international association for research in economic psychology (IAREP') and the society for the advancement of behavioral economics(SABE). Paris, France, 2006.

共引文献85

同被引文献40

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部