分歧的取向——“后理论”景观扫描

Different Orientations——A Scanning of “Post Theory” Landscape

无论是文学理论、理论还是后理论,都涉及理论与文学研究的关系这一根本问题。近年来,文学理论界围绕"后理论"掀起了讨论热潮,形成了话语生产醒目的景观。不应忽视的是,后理论有着诸多不同的取径:以为理论终结乃至可以弃绝理论者有之,主张理论因散布而取得成功者有之,强调理论回归文学者有之,张扬理论的反思与多元者亦有之,如此等等。对于后理论存在分歧的多重意味及各自的内部构成,应予具体分析,区别对待。

All literary theories, or the post theories, deal with the relationship between theory and literary research. In recent years,a heated discussion arose around the＂post theories＂, forming an eye catching landscape of the discourse production. It is noticeable that post theories have many different school, some insisting on the end and rejection of theory, some claiming that theories are successful because they are spread, some arguing for the return of theory to literature, some advocating theoretic reflection and diversity,and so forth. So the multiple means and the internal constitution of the post theories should be analyzed concretely and treated separately.