摘要
从对证据属性理论"客观性"、"关联性"和"合法性"三性的逻辑悖论的分析到结合民事诉讼程序的动态考察所发现的诸多问题来看,以传统的、静态的视角研究证据属性的方法已经式微,有必要从程序法的视角,根据程序的动态变化重新认识证据,所有进入案件程序的与案件有关的材料均为证据,而不必纠结于所谓的证据属性理论。采用程序性证据概念,明确区分"何为证据"和"何种证据能被采用并具有多大证明力",对于避免证据属性理论造成的"证据怪圈",维持证据理论的科学性和稳定性,指导我国实践中证据规则体系的完善具有重要价值。
From the analysis of logic paradox of "objectivity", "relevance" and "legality" of evidence attribute theory to the combination with dynamic understanding of civil procedure, the study of evidence attribute from the perspective of traditional and static way has become declined. It is necessary to have a new understanding of evidence according to dynamic change of procedure from the perspective of procedure law. All the relevant materials in the process of case are evidence and it is not necessary to struggle with the so - called evidence attribute theory. It is of vital importance to make a clear distinction between "what evidence is" and "what kind of evidence can be adopted and its degree of proof" in the aspect of avoiding "absurd circle of evidence" resulted from evidence attribute theory, maintaining stability and scientificity of evidence theory and improving the evidence regulation system in practice.
出处
《山东警察学院学报》
北大核心
2016年第1期12-18,共7页
Journal of Shandong Police College
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究项目"当代中国人口流动性背景下的缺席审判制度研究"(项目批准号:09YJC820075)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
证据属性
客观性
关联性
合法性
民事诉讼程序
evidence attribute, objectivity, relevance, legality, civil procedure