摘要
大陆法系行为保全制度由来已久,程序设置较为完备。而中国当下的行为保全制度尚在探索阶段,无论是立法体例还是审查程序,大陆法系的学理研究与立法实践均可资借鉴。新近颁行的《民事诉讼法》中行为保全程序的立法体例虽是当下较优的选择,但在程序启动、保全对象确定、行为保全方式的选取乃至保全竞合等方面都仍有进一步拓展的必要。同时,立足诉讼环境的现实需要,中国应当确立行为保全非讼化的审理模式。
The system of act preservation in the civil law has a long history and has set up comparatively complete program,while China's current act preservation is still in its primary stage. Whether in legislative style or review process,the academic research and legislative practice of the civil law system are available for reference. Although China's recent legislative style of act preservation procedure in the Civil Procedure Law presents a comparatively better choice,there is still a need for further expansion in program start,determination of preservation objects,selection of actions,and action preservation competition. Meanwhile,to meet the practical needs of litigation environment,China should establish the trial mode of act preservation noncontentiousness.
出处
《中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)》
2016年第1期42-46,共5页
Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)
基金
西南政法大学研究生科研创新项目(XZYJS2014223)
关键词
大陆法系
行为保全
立法体例
审查程序
civil law
act preservation
legislative style
review process