期刊文献+

“童星”现象怪圈及立法保护路径——兼评新《广告法》第三十八条 被引量:5

Child Performer Chaotic Phenomenon and Its Legislative Approach: Comment on Article 38 of China's New Advertisement Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2015年新修改的《中华人民共和国广告法》采纳了其修订草案二次审议稿中提出的"禁止10周岁以下未成年人进行广告代言"的观点。该规定意在通过抑制未成年人劳动权利从而达到对其进行保护的目的,并存在着进一步侵害"童星"权益,与民法若干原则相抵触的弊端。我国《劳动法》虽然提出了"未成年人从事文艺事业"这一概念,但没有建立起配套的法律规范对这一未成年人群体的权益进行专门保护,且在未来的立法路径选择上也存在抑制说和保护说两种竞争。而美国、英国及日本的相关"童星"保护立法中关于申请审核制、工作范围、工作时间及取得报酬权利方面的规定,可为我国进一步完善"童星"保护立法提供经验与借鉴。 Pursuant to Article 38 of China's new Advertisement Law, minors who are less than 10 years old are not eligible to be advertising endorsers any more. The intention of the legislators is to provide the child performers with more legal protection, but it is unfair that the future protection for the minors is at the cost of their work opportunities. Needless to say that the new rule is against its host law, General Rule of Civil Law, and its loopholes may lead even more infringement results to the minors. Considering the fact that there is a legislative blank in our labor law system relating to the child performers, introducing and analyzing legislations in United States, United Kingdoms and Japan, would provide us with new ideas about how to protect child performers' personal and property interests for the future legislative process, such as the work permits and maximum workhours.
作者 孙遥
机构地区 山东大学法学院
出处 《当代青年研究》 CSSCI 2016年第1期83-90,共8页 Contemporary Youth Research
关键词 “童星”保护 “童星”权益 工作许可制 工作时间制 Child Performers' Protection Minor's Interests Work Permit Maximum Workhours
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1台湾修法:童星日工作时间不得超过8 小时[EB/OL].http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2013-11-27/072628822165.shtml. 2013-11-27.
  • 2《中华人民共和国广告法》( 修订稿草案二次审议稿)[EB/OL]. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/xinwen/lfgz/flca/2014-12/29/content_1891913.htm.2014-12-29.
  • 3黄春景. 禁止童星广告是对孩子负责[EB/OL]. http://news.bandao.cn/news_html/201412 /20141224/news_20141224_2486939.shtml. 2014-12-24. 龙玉琴,商西. 《广告法》修订:10 岁以下或不得当代言人[EB/OL]. http://www.nandu.com/html/201412/22/1044219.html. 2014-12-22.
  • 4黄仕琼. 禁止“ 童星” 代言广告值得肯定[EB/OL]. http://www.tianjinwe.com/rollnews/201412/t20141225_775153.html.2014-12-25, 王琦. 禁止儿童代言彰显法律善意[EB/OL].http://www.wenming.cn/wmzh_pd/sy/201412/t20141226_2371794.shtml.2014-12-26.
  • 5Douglas E. Abrams & Sarah H. Ramsey. Children and the Law: Doctrine, Policy and Practice [M]. West-Thomson Reuters. 2010:210-218.
  • 6刘保玉,秦伟.论自然人的民事责任能力[J].法学研究,2001,23(2):77-88. 被引量:76
  • 7Gerald Solk. Legal Rights and Obligations of Minors in the Entertainment Industry: TheCalifornia Approach [J]. Journal of JuvenileLaw, 1980 (1):78-80.
  • 8JessicaRey. Are Children Who Appear on Reality Television Adequately Protected by Federal and State Law-[J]. Student ScholarshipPaper 398, 2013: 1-25.
  • 9Robert A. Martis. Children in the Entertainment Industry: Are They Being Protected- An Analysisof the California and New Yorkapproaches[J]. Loyola of Los AngelesEntertainment Law Review, 1988(8): 25-54.
  • 10Courtney Glickman. Child Entertainment Labor Law Complaints[J]. Whittier Law Review, 2010(32):147-148.

二级参考文献6

  • 1李庆海.论民事行为能力与民事责任能力[J].法商研究,1999,17(1):69-72. 被引量:27
  • 2史尚宽.《民法总论》[M].,1980年自版.第42页.
  • 3郭明瑞 房绍坤 唐广良.《民商法原理》(一)[M].中国人民大学出版社,1999年版.第499页.
  • 4林纪东,郑玉波等主编.《新编六法参照法令判解全书》,五南图书出版公司,1986年版,第180页.
  • 5马俊驹,余延满.《民法原论》上册,法律出版社,1999年版.第108、113页.第104页以下.第109,110,114页.
  • 6刘土国.《现代侵权损客赔偿研究》,法律出版社,1998年版,第295页.

共引文献75

同被引文献31

  • 1薛军.走出监护人“补充责任”的误区——论《侵权责任法》第32条第2款的理解与适用[J].华东政法大学学报,2010,13(3):114-122. 被引量:84
  • 2Campbell, Dorothy. Stand by Me: the Tennessee Protection of Minor Performers Act[ J]. Tennessee Bar Journal, 2004, (11).
  • 3United Kingdoms The Children and Young Persons Act 1963, Section 37.
  • 4United Kingdoms Department of Education. Child Performance Regulations: Performance Hours and Breaks [EB/OL]. https://www. gov. uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment _ data/file/ 322045/consultation doc final 19_Jnne.pdf, 2014-06-19/2016-07- 02.
  • 5CAL. FAM. CODE. 6752(b).
  • 6Krieg, Jessica. There's No Business Like Show Business: Child Entertainers and the Law [ J ]. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor and Employment Law, 2004, (6).
  • 7Koocher, Gerald and Keith-Spiegel, Patricia. Children, Eth- ics, and the Law: Professional Issues and Cases [ M ]. Lincoln, Nebras- ka: University of Nebraska Press, 1990: 169.
  • 8Coogan v. Bemstein. No. C426045 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1938).
  • 9Staenberg, Marc and Stuart, Daniel. Children as Chattels: The Disturbing Plight of Child Performers [ J ]. Beverly Hills Business Associa- tion Journal, 1997, (32).
  • 10CAL. FAM. CODE. 771.

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部