期刊文献+

我国间接税对城乡居民收入分配的效应分析 被引量:14

The Effect Analysis of Indirect Taxation on Income Distribution in Urban and Rural China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据间接税的再分配原理建立模型,运用广义熵指数(MLD)和2002—2012年的数据测算了我国三种主要间接税(增值税、消费税、营业税)对城乡居民收入分配的作用或效应。研究发现,我国现行间接税制对城乡居民收入分配不具有正向调节功能,反而具有逆向调节作用:与税前收入差距相比,税后城乡居民的收入差距增大;城乡内部收入差距的扩大要大于城乡之间收入差距的扩大。从三种主要税收各自的作用来看,增值税的逆向调节作用显得更突出一些,其次是消费税,最后是营业税;我国间接税制之所以呈现逆向的分配调节效应,主要是因为三种主要间接税的税率设计不科学、基本生活品(服务)和非基本生活品(服务)的适用税率没有拉开档距。 According to indirect tax redistribution principle, and using the generalized entropy (MLD) index and data from the year 2002 to 2012 in China, we respectively build a model and measure the role or effect of three major indirect tax ( including VAT, consumption tax, business tax) adjusting income distributions in urban and rural China. It is found that the current indirect tax system has an unfair adjustment role, namely reverse distribution effect. Compared with the pre-tax income gap, after-tax income gap of urban and rural residents increases ; the expansion of income gap within urban and rural areas ( mainly resulting from the widening of rural income gap) is much higher than between areas. When considering three major tax imqucnce on income distribution, we conclude that the effect of VAT widening income gap is much obvious, followed by consumption tax, and finally the effect of business tax is the weakest of the three. The reverse adjustment role of indirect tax system mainly results from that the design of tax rates is not scientific. In detail, tax rate span between basic goods (services) and non-basic goods (services) doesn't appropriately expand.
作者 王德祥 赵婷
出处 《审计与经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期100-110,共11页 Journal of Audit & Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(08BJY107) 武汉大学社会科学重点项目
关键词 间接税 城乡收入差距 税收制度 税制结构改革 税制模式 流转税 税收改革 收入分配效应 收入再分配 税制改革 indirect tax urban and rural income gap tax system tax structure reform tax mode income distribution tax reform income distribution effect income redistribution tax system reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1杨杨,杜剑,束磊.我国间接税与收入分配公平关系的实证分析[J].税务与经济,2012(5):66-72. 被引量:3
  • 2Atkinson A B, Stiglitz J E. The design of tax structure: direct versus indirect taxation [ J ]. Journal of Public Economics, 1976,6 (1 -2 ) : 55 -75.
  • 3Sah R K. How Much Redistribution is Possible Through Commodity Taxes? [ J ]. Journal of Public Economics, 1983,20 ( 1 ) : 89 - 101.
  • 4Kakwani N C. Measurement of Tax Prograssivity: An International Comparison [ J ]. Eeonoimie Journal, 1977,87 ( 345 ) :71 - 80.
  • 5Freebaim J. Options and Prospects for Taxation Reform[ J]. The Economic Record, 1997,73 (223) :373 -386.
  • 6Kaplanoglou G, Newbery D M. Redistributive Impact of Indirect Tax Reforms: Greece, 1988-2002 [ J ]. Fiscal Studies, 2004,25 (2) :225 -247.
  • 7Rele H T. Measuring the lifetime redistribution achieved by dutch taxation, cash transfer and non-cash benefits programs[ J]. Review of In- come and Wealth ,2007,53 (2) :335- 362.
  • 8Saez E. Direct or indirect tax instruments for redistribution: short-run versus Long-Run [ J ]. Journal of Public Economics ,2004,88 (3 -4) : 503 -518.
  • 9Deeoster A, Loughrey J, Donoghlie C. Incidence and weffare effects of indirect taxes[ DB/OL]. http://www. Umdcipe. org,2009.
  • 10刘怡,聂海峰.间接税负担对收入分配的影响分析[J].经济研究,2004,39(5):22-30. 被引量:159

二级参考文献100

共引文献355

同被引文献170

引证文献14

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部