期刊文献+

腰椎棘板螺钉动态内固定系统的生物力学研究 被引量:1

The biomechanical study research of lumbar laminar screw system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨棘板螺钉内固定系统(Laminar screw dynamic system,LS)对腰椎生物力学的影响。方法采用9具新鲜成人的尸体标本,取腰椎(L1~L5节段)作为研究对象。将标本固定于生物力学试验机。手术节段为L4-5,两个椎体植入金属标记体,记录运动范围。根据标本的先后的不同处理方法分为完整组(NS组:保留关节突及韧带)、失稳组(IS组:切除双侧黄韧带及小关节内侧1/2部分)、棘板螺钉固定组(LS组:即L4双侧下关节突内侧1/2切除,黄韧带切除+L4、L5棘板螺钉固定)、Coflex固定组(CS组:L4双侧下关节突内侧1/2切除,黄韧带切除+Coflex植入)和坚强固定组(PS组:L4双侧下关节突内侧1/2切除,黄韧带切除+椎弓根螺钉植入)等5组,各在前屈、后伸、左右侧弯、左右旋转6个方向加载生理载荷,测试椎体(或椎间盘)的刚度、强度以及各个方向的运动范围。结果 LS组和CS组的椎体(或椎间盘)强度无显著差异(P〉0.05),两者均高于IS组(P〈0.05)。LS、CS、NS组垂直位移无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。与NS相比,LS和CS组的轴向和剪切刚度无统计学差异(P〉0.05),PS组刚度显著增高(P〈0.05)。结论棘板螺钉内固定和Coflex能够良好的恢复腰椎的即刻稳定性并保留活动度。 Objective To explore the biomechanical influence of lumbar laminar screw system on lumbar vertebrates. Methods 9 fresh cadaver specimens were obtained and the L1-5were adopt to finish the experiment. Specimens were fixed on the biomechanical machine. They were received different treatment in order of keeping all facets and ligaments(NS group), removing the flavum ligaments and half of facet(IS group), fixing specimens in IS group with LS(LS group), fixing specimens in IS group with Coflex system(CS group), fixing specimens in IS group with pedicle screw system(PS group). With physiological load, the vertebral stiffness, strength and movements of specimens in flexion, extention, lateral flexion and rotation were tested and analyzed. Result BMD Strength in the LS and CS groups were appear no significant difference(P〈0.05), while they were higher than that in IS group(P〈0.05). Vertical displacement in LS, CS and NS group were not significant different(P〈0.05). Compared with NS group,vertical and horizontal stiffness in LS and CS groups were not significantly different(P〈0.05). The average stiffness in all other groups were lower than that in PS group(P〈0.05). Conclusion LS and Coflex system can effectively recover the immediate stability and keep the activity of lumbar.
出处 《浙江创伤外科》 2016年第1期5-8,共4页 Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery
基金 科技项目:庆科发(2013)35 号(48)
关键词 棘板螺钉 非融合 手术 稳定性 Laminar screw Non-fusion Surgery Stability
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1陈一衡,徐丁,徐华梓,池永龙,王向阳,黄其杉.Coflex棘突间动力内固定装置治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄[J].中国骨伤,2009,22(12):902-905. 被引量:17
  • 2Villarejo F,Carceller F,de |a Riva AG,et al.Experience with coflex interspinous implant [J].Acta Neurochir Supp|.2011,108: 171-175.
  • 3毛仲轩,江建明,闫慧博,赵卫东,李勇,吴伟平.腰椎单节段棘突间Coflex^TM固定对脊柱三维运动的影响[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2009(3):333-336. 被引量:7
  • 4Hartmann F,Dietz SO,Hely H,et al.Biomechanical effect of dit:- ferent interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion un- der preload eonditions[J].Areh Orthop Trauma Surg,2011,131(7 ) : 917 -926.
  • 5Trautwein VF,Lowery GL,Wharton ND,et al.Determination o1 th(: in vivo posterior loading environment of the Cotlex interlamimu'- interspinous implant[J].Spine J, 2010,10 (3) : 244-251.
  • 6Kuehta J,Sobottke R,Eysel P,et al. Two-year results of int~~r- spinous spacer (X-Stop)implantation in 175 patients with ncuro- logic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Era" Spine J .2009,18:823 - 829.
  • 7Chung KJ,Hwang YS,Koh SH. Stress Fracture of Bilateral Post~, rior Facet After Insertion of Interspinous Implant. SPINE,2009. E380-E383.
  • 8Kettler A,Drumm J,Heuer F,et al. Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea. Clin Biomech (Bristol ,Avon). 2008,23(2) :242-7.

二级参考文献17

  • 1周跃,梅芳瑞,张峡,吴远清.保留脊柱后韧带复合结构多椎板切除术的生物力学研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,1994,11(5):267-267. 被引量:11
  • 2连平,孙荣华,杨维权,王维民,刘大雄,张连生,杨广才,贾连顺,戴力杨,徐印坎,张永涛.腰椎椎管与硬膜囊横截面积及其动态变化的实验研究[J].中华外科杂志,1995,33(3):151-154. 被引量:17
  • 3Etebar S,Cahill DW. Risk factors for adjacent-segnent failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumention for degenerative instability[J].J Neurosurg, 1999, 90(2 suppl) :163-169.
  • 4Minns R J, Walsh WK. Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine[J]. Spine, 1999, 22(16): 1819-1825.
  • 5Wilke HJ, Drumm J, H?ussler K, et al.Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure [J].Eur Spine J, 2008,17(8): 1049-1056.
  • 6Kong DS, Kim ES, Eoh W. One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative sPinal stenosis with segmental instability[J].J Korean Med Sci,2007,22(2):330-335.
  • 7Talwar V, Lindsey DP, Frederick AD, et al. Insertion loads of the X-STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication [J]. Eur Spine J, 2006,15 (6): 908-912.
  • 8ShePherd DET, Leahy JC, Mathias K J, et al. Spinous process strength[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(3):319-323.
  • 9McKenna PJ,Freeman BJ,Mulholland RC,et al. A prospective, randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus a titanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with minimum 2- year clinical results. Eur Spine J, 2005,14 (8) :727-737.
  • 10Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Assessment of surgical treatment of low back pain. Jpn Orthop Assoc, 1984,58 : 1183-1187.

共引文献20

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部