裁判文书说理的法理分析

legal analysis of the reasoning of juridical document

裁判文书说理研究是当代法学研究的重要领域,它是实践导向开放的问题域。将裁判文书说理研究置于语言游戏视域中的法律修辞研究,为审判实践尤其是裁判书的说理论证提供了全新角度和评判标准:裁判文书的说理体现在主体间相互共识及妥当理由之上;在司法活动的进程中,无论是哪一位参加者都有权通过游戏的规则和修辞方法来陈述观点,表达意愿,达成共识,实现合理的可接受性,因而参与语言游戏"规则"的法律修辞运用,可增强裁判文书的合理性和可接受性。

The research of the referee documents＇s reasoning is the important area of contemporary legal research. It is the open problem areas of practice guidance. The Legal rhetoric study of putting the research of the referee documents＇s reasoning in the vision of language game, Provides a new Angle and evaluation standards for the trial practice, especially for the referee documents＇s reasoning. The referee documents＇s reasoning embodies upon mutual agreement between the subject and the appropriate reason. In the process of judicial activities, whichever Participants shall have the right to expressed standpoint and willingness, reach a consensus; realize rational acceptability by the rules of the game and the rhetoric method statement. So the Legal rhetoric using of the vision of language game can enhance the rationality and acceptability of the judicial documents.